Frankly, I find your throwaway votes lazier than my vote with at least a hint of case behind it. You are so lazy here that you didn't take a look at other people voting for Agatha and their lazy votes.
One more thing about Agatha:
I'm not confident about you being a baddie. With zero real wolves dead and most people making a minimum of posts so far, it's difficult to build a proper case, but the appeal to emotion in this post is something I dislike and find wolfy in general.
Because a vote on you at this time of day is clearly a throwaway. Most people haven't even voted yet?
And I vote you as the lazy one here because you specifically list one of your reasons for voting Agatha as "making a proper wagon," you may have other, more valid reasons, but that's just silly. Why not just elaborate and expand on them. You were much more coherent in defending yourself then you were making your vote just now. In addition, if you feel the other voters of Agatha were lazy here, why did you follow them? Or at least even try to engage with them?
I'm inclined to agree with Capage here - Capage put some reasoning behind his vote, and blithely dismissing it rubs me the wrong way. With that said, I do tend to read frustration, at least on the Paradox forums, as a goodie tell, and am more inclined to read Witch Agatha as goodie rather than otherwise.
Vote alxeu
Just remember it's not personal - after you get a few games under your belt, you lose your newbie protection and tend to be targeted more frequently. Call it a Paradox rite of passage.
It's not a blithe dismissal. The post itself is lazy and formulaic. It's quite easy to list three people you find suspicious, then hop on whichever one suits your current purposes best.
For example,
I agree with aedan that Arkasas is suspicious, as he broke a tie that included known baddie R.Graymarch, saving R.Graymarch in the process while pushing up the (now known) seer. That the Horns of Terror were the ones who
probably hunted last night means that if they did know who the seer was, Arkasas' vote seems all the more pronounced.
Grimlock is suspicious for immediately revenge voting Agatha. I mean, come on, man.
Capage is suspicious for a lazy vote, as well as now acknowledging that the other Agatha voters are lazy and still following a case that was started and built by lazy people.
Of the three cases, I feel that Capage should be the one we pursue.
[Insert Vote Here]
And while it may have been previously discussed that which makes Sleepyhead and Arkasas suspicious, and I am fine with Capage just saying "I like aedan's reasoning," I'd at least like some engagement and reasoning as to why Capage finds Sleepy suspicious. I can only assume it's because of Sleepy's reason for voting Arkasas.
Also, this is funny, in retrospect:
Sleepyhead's post used a lot of words to avoid voting both Captain Grim and Wagon. I kinda side with Panzer on reasoning being weak.
Posted earlier today. Not only did Sleepy absolutely avoid voting Grimlock and Wagon, but now both of those same people are voting together on Agatha.
Unvote Capage
Vote Grimlock
This is actually odd enough to not ignore, in my opinion.