I hate discord and that kind of moderation but no, this thread is currently empty of discussion and full of bigotry and one upsmanship and glad you as a gay man can say this is fine and glide above it, but as a gay woman, this is toxic bigotry that specifically makes this forum in this current discuss not a place where anyone except the bigots and trolls can speak, all for the trolls going completely off topic, half of the discussion here would even be unacceptable in the off topic forum ffs, and into bigotry just to compete on bull argument for sake of argument. THIS IS NOT OPEN DIALOGUE, much less the beauty of it.
If you can't discuss a mod without being caught in a psuedo intellectual trolling game of word twisting and antisemitism pulling, then no it's not an open discussion but a hostile environment. Open discussions are moderated to allow all voices to speak, not hate forcing out all other voices.
Read the forum rules and stop defending the breaches of them and really just move this whole discussion to OT so a thread over there can be locked not the one for this mod
You're making a lot of very pointed accusations that I just don't feel are grounded in the reality of this conversation. I understand there's views here you don't agree with - there's views I don't agree with too! - but it's unclear to me how you get from that to 'toxic bigotry' and 'trolls' and 'unacceptable' and 'bull argument' and 'pseudo intellectual' and 'antisemitism' and 'hostile environment' and 'hate'. Mere disagreement is not any of those things. The posts would not still be up, given the forum's strong and good moderation, if the mods agreed with your characterisation of them.
You're completely discounting the possibility this could be a good faith discussion amongst people with conflicting views, who are respectfully engaging one another in those views. It's worth noting that the person with views you and I might find most disagreeable has actually lost the argument. It is
always better for a person with bad views to air those views out, get pushback, hear a counter-argument, and maybe reflect on those views and hopefully move in them - then it is to just pretend those views don't exist because you don't agree with them, and leave them to simmer unchallenged. Those folk will find other places they
can talk freely, and those won't be places where their views will be challenged.
As a fellow gay person - I've been arguing for gay rights for many years. When I was born, gay love itself was a criminal offence in much of the world, including most of the US and Europe. You can imagine what the discourse on gay people was like. If our approach all along had been to say "you're bigoted, so I'm not talking to you", then we would still have a society that's 80-90% opposed to gay rights. You would be dealing with rhetoric
every day that it kind of sounds like you may never have actually heard before, if you think this thread is bigotry. I've talked to
actually bigoted people - rank, vile hatred, not just differences of opinion - and I'm so grateful I have, because with years of patient counter-argument, folk like you and I have achieved a measure of equality I could never have dreamt of growing up. As gay people we must defend free speech. It is the only reason we have achieved what we have. That goes for any minority seeking equality and justice, even in the most prejudiced system or forum (which this isn't, this is a forum run by a progressive Swedish developer).