Who is talking about USD?
Uh, what does that have to do with anything?
Obviously I'd be talking about USD because I'm an American and thus have easy access to only American pricing. Adoi.
- 4
Who is talking about USD?
If they gonna criticize the product or at least tell the unpleasant truth, then it threatens them that they will no longer receive free copies or early access. So, it’s only natural for them to misinterpret and hush up the negative aspects of the product which is given to them .Im still mad at all these youtubers that lied to us selling Imperator as the best game about Rome ever created, i learned to never trust someone who gets a free game to get more views on their channel
Uh, what does that have to do with anything?
Obviously I'd be talking about USD because I'm an American and thus have easy access to only American pricing. Adoi.
I would like to say based on that fact there is little chance, but their releases have been poor recently, so we will see.
Going by steam chartsOnly Imperator has actually been poor
I'm still seeing people say how Stellaris and HOI4 are trash. But I've seen that mostly on the Steam Reviews and usually about the massive amounts of DLC CK2 and EU4 have, which is it's own can of worms.People had/have their complaints about Stellaris and HoI4, but those games are both still very popular
I'm still seeing people say how Stellaris and HOI4 are trash. But I've seen that mostly on the Steam Reviews and usually about the massive amounts of DLC CK2 and EU4 have, which is it's own can of worms.
The developers of CK3 even changed feudal contracts when people complained about it in the DD, don't think anything similar happened with Imperator: Rome and there was alot of complaning, more so than on CK3 if I remember correctly.The problems with IR were well known and commented on the forums beforehand during dev diaries and the like. Johan just brushed everyone off and even famously pre release essentially said "mana is here to stay don't like it don't buy it".
CK3 will no doubt have problems at launch, as every paradox game does, but unless the team arrogantly decides to ignore practically all of the prerelease feedback they have received so far like the IR brain trust did, then I have hopes that the flaws won't be so fatal that we wake up 6 months post release to 1500 player counts wondering wtf happened.
Only Imperator has actually been poor, though. People had/have their complaints about Stellaris and HoI4, but those games are both still very popular, well-reviewed and recently launched record-setting expansions.
I think people are largely okay with the usual amount of bugs/jank associated with these huge complex games. Imperator just had the bad but also none of the good, and so far nothing we’ve seen from CK3 suggests the same thing. To me at least.
I'm personally wondering if such flexibility to do changes is due to how badly I:R did. But this comes from how having devs change something like this, out of nowhere, is not a very common thing in the gaming industry from what I've heard. As it takes away time from working on other stuff etc. But I could be wrong.The developers of CK3 even changed feudal contracts when people complained about it in the DD
Low... quality? In what way? If you mean that it is stylized in a painterly style that's not low quality that's just it being stylized (which will look good for a lot longer than more realistic looking stuff). Unless its something else you're talking about?the low quality of the map...
It has everything to with it as you incorrectly just assumed I was talking about USD - which I'm not...