Will different POPs grow at different rate?

[Taylor]

I'm talking about the natural growth, not migration and/or pop type converting.

Because historically, in the Victoria era some classes just reproduced faster than others. A well-known example is the fact that enslaved people reproduced relatively slowly. And I guess richer people reproduced faster because their children were healthier (this I don't know for sure).

 

[KevinG]

I'm talking about the natural growth, not migration and/or pop type converting.

Because historically, in the Victoria era some classes just reproduced faster than others. A well-known example is the fact that enslaved people reproduced relatively slowly. And I guess richer people reproduced faster because their children were healthier (this I don't know for sure).

You got it completely backwards. On average, poor people reproduce more than rich people. Best not to make a topic about something without even bothering to do a quick google.

 

[Karri]

You got it completely backwards. On average, poor people reproduce more than rich people. Best not to make a topic about something without even bothering to do a quick google.

Care to dish out some proof for that?

 

[Taylor]

You got it completely backwards. On average, poor people reproduce more than rich people. Best not to make a topic about something without even bothering to do a quick google.

Not true for the Victorian era, where there was no birth control.

edit: and of course, my topic wasn't actually about the question which population group reproduced faster (that's for the devs to find out), but whether the feature of different growth rates for different POPs was implemented or not. So please refrain from lecturing me about whether or not to start a thread.

 

[King]

No