Afaik much of the failure was down to bad weather.It seems like Verdun would be a horrible place to make a stand, and that getting the French to commit everything to doing so was correctly playing into German strengths.
So why did the german plan fail?
Was it simply the fact of mission creep? The Germans stayed on the attack too long and bled alongside the French?
German artillery wasn't as productive as anticipated and the French were too resilien to collapse from the casualties inflicted?
Or was it a flawed plan from the beginning and attritional warfare was a deadend in 1916?
First the weather delayed the start of the offensive by a weak or so which allowed the French, who had gotten wind of the buildup by then, time to bring in reinforcements.
Then in the beginning of the offensive there was heavy rains and snow which turned the battlefield into mud which slowed the advance and made it hard to get the field artillery where it was needed and allowed the French time to get even more reinforcements in to the salient.
In the end the Germans were unable to quickly take their objectives and instead continued to fight on the offensive (the alternative was basically to surrender what gains they had made in the salient and return to their starting positions) and took heavy casualties doing so.