Terraforming candidates are Barren worlds.
"Barren and rocky world with a thin or non-existent atmosphere....."
They cost 5k energy to terraform to Hot climates (Arid/Desert/Savannah)
10k to temperate climates (Continental/Ocean/Tropical)
and 15k to cold climates (Alpine/Arctic/Tundra).
As climates are, as far as I'm aware, equivalent in all other respects; doesn't this inequality make hot climates an objectively better pick?
This discussion is independent of whatever fluff behind terraforming one might invent.
Though if you were to do so, I'd imagine cold climates to be the easier to attain terraforming target, not hot!
"Barren and rocky world with a thin or non-existent atmosphere....."
They cost 5k energy to terraform to Hot climates (Arid/Desert/Savannah)
10k to temperate climates (Continental/Ocean/Tropical)
and 15k to cold climates (Alpine/Arctic/Tundra).
As climates are, as far as I'm aware, equivalent in all other respects; doesn't this inequality make hot climates an objectively better pick?
This discussion is independent of whatever fluff behind terraforming one might invent.
Though if you were to do so, I'd imagine cold climates to be the easier to attain terraforming target, not hot!