I highlighted part for you where you seems to support isolation or Berlin wall in Asia. Maybe you should be a bit more organized how you explain yourself.
Wut? Boy do you have a sense of irony, mate.
I guess domino theory makes sense if you ignore completely local history, traditions, nations and politics.
Perhaps you could tell me how many pro-PRC Communist insurgencies were present in South-East Asia prior to 1949, and how many pro-Soviet ones there were prior to 1917? Thank you.
To me it seems to be an easy way to to propagate to public why your nation have to wage war in some remote jungle. Also it seems to be offering to an incompetent government a simple solutions on complex issue.
And this is incorrect, as has been pointed out repeatedly.
This only makes domino theory to look like even more ridiculous. There is not and never were an unified force to take over whole region which completely cripples your main point. Again, a simple explanation to simple people. US actually lost, and there was no domino effect, which again cripples this logic.
It does nothing of the sort. There were several, well-documented attempts of Communist insurgencies during the Cold War, supported by at least one (and often both) main Communist powers within the region in addition to parties on both sides of the Sino-Soviet divide, whose stated objective was to overthrow the existing regime and replace it with a communist one. It doesn't matter whether these regimes were pro-Beijing or pro-Moscow, they were both communist. Given that the domino theory, as articulated by the US in the 1940's-70's was about halting the spread of communism, it matters not which particular variety or strand of communism these states and parties happened to profess.