Originally posted by Propaganda
The USSR fell on it's side because of it's inability to maintain a non-corrupt beaurocracy. Those who were, stole as much as they could, leaving those who worked, with very little of what was actually there. The only man who understood this was Stalin, as in his time, he used to loot and plunder himself, quite well, actually. He set out on his crusade of purges to get rid of much of this cancer, which is mainly why the USSR industrialized itself as amazingly fast as it did. Those who remained, unscathed, shut up and did what they were told. However, when Khruschev and Breznhev showed their faces, they gave the beaurocrats a lot more breathing room, even giving them substantial raises and priviledges. And this is when it started to decay...again. This time, however, no one was there to stop the cancer from spreading. In fact, when Gorbachev came to power, and decided to put a lid on the beaurocracy, what he did was effectively speed the USSR's death, by actually supporting the beaorocracy more than the previous premiers and leaders(eventhough, he said he wanted to get rid of it!).
I don't think you can blame USSR collapse on bureaucracy. As you well know, bureaucratic and corrupt systems can survive for centuries (think China). It was rather bureacracy's (read: Communist Party) inability to defend the state and its interests that was to blame. It is still a mystery to me why millions of Communists (including top officials) did virtually nothing to prevent USSR fast decay. The problem was that Communist Party (mostly due to Kruschev) pretty much replaced the state apparatus and when people stopped believing in Commusism, they stopped believing in the state itself. Very sad, really.