why can't i pass blank maps with armies? or why is it even blanked in the area the left to tibet (i know about the performance option ), it makes playing tibet annoying as i need a big detour to go to the west
why can't i pass blank maps with armies? it makes playing tibet hard as i need a big detour to go persia areas
- Thread starter signeduptodownload
- Start date
-
Hello Everyone, Today we've upgraded to the latest version of our forum software, bringing more features and better performance to the community. As always, we appreciate your bug reports and feedback, and you can post all of that here, as well as view the list of new features
-
Crusader Kings III Available Now!
The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
This thread is more than 5 months old.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose. If you feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though.
That's the point. Same reason as why Hindu Kush and Tian Shan are impassable.
- 2
then why is there a trade route there? ( hindu kush)
why not just make it a pass there by changing the county shape to simulate a small pass connecting those two counties by the mountain
might as well blank out tibet area if it's like that
We believe that a pass that allows a small caravan through should not be a pass that allows an army through. This matters in games like CK2 where armies can move between provinces so long as there's a connection, regardless of army sizes.
Had CK2 disallowed military access into certain areas based on army sizes, we would have considered that option.
- 2
- 2
STOP! COOKIE TIME