Why can you start civil wars that aren't of your ideology?

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

aruon

UwU?
81 Badges
Mar 21, 2012
6.028
3.787
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Leviathan: Warships
  • Supreme Ruler: Cold War
  • Steel Division: Normand 44 Sign-up
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Tyranny: Gold Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • BATTLETECH
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Tyranny - Tales from the Tiers
  • Tyranny - Bastards Wound
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • 500k Club
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
The most bizarre example of this (aside from Lenin, mentioned above) is probably the American government's support of the Khmer Rouge - arguably the most mindlessly barbaric regime in modern history - simply because both the United States and Cambodia opposed North Vietnam, and so they found themselves as co-belligerents, if not actual allies. This is especially weird when you consider that the Khmer Rouge and the Viet Cong were sister branches of the same political party, and the regime in Cambodia was far, far harsher than that in North Vietnam.

It may be the best example of 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend.'

or that the US was kinda psychotic towards other countries. with many US presidents the cold war was either an coup-fest or an assassination killing spree. hell i think the CIA tried to kill Sukarno about a dozen times.
 

nauticalweasel

Captain
70 Badges
Jan 1, 2015
475
207
  • Victoria 2
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Tyranny: Gold Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
or that the US was kinda psychotic towards other countries. with many US presidents the cold war was either an coup-fest or an assassination killing spree. hell i think the CIA tried to kill Sukarno about a dozen times.
Yeah, the Cold War is ... not a good time, it takes all the crazy of WWII and cranks it up to 11. I mean contras, mind control programs, the space race some people would think they might have just stopped at really big bombs but they'd be wrong.
Edit: Not even mentioning cocaine and its connection to the contras.
 

potski

Field Marshal
17 Badges
Mar 15, 2006
3.885
3.044
  • Steel Division: Normandy 44
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife Pre-Order
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Cities: Skylines
  • 500k Club
Imperial Germany aided Lenin's take-over of Russia, so it's not totally beyond plausibility.
In 1914 Lenin was in Galicia and arrested for being Russian. Although he was released he was forced to go to neutral Switzerland, the Tsar's secret police would have arrested him if he had gone back to Russia.

In 1917 when the February Revolution occurred a number of Russian exiles (including Lenin and his wife) requested permission to travel through Germany to the coast, where they went by ferry to Sweden. Then onto Finland, then St.Petersburg. The condition of the German government was that the train should "closed" - they weren't allowed to stop and get off the train during the journey, or allow anyone on to it. The decision was undoubtedly made because the people involved advocated that Russia should pull out of the war.

Lenin was back in Russia in April 1917. It was not until the summer of 1917 that he openly advocated the overthrow of the Kerensky regime. In part because Kerensky wanted to continue to fight the war.

There was no civil war in 1917, nor did the German's "support" the Bolsheviks to seize power in the coup in October 1917. They neither needed nor wanted support from Germany, they had the support of major sections of the army and navy and the working class in the cities.

The first stage of the civil war broke out shortly after that, in Finland. Nationalists declared independence from Russia, and communists then seized power in Helsinki and other cities. The Finland nationalists, including Gen. Mannerheim, then crushed the communists with German support. IIRC three full strength Divisions were sent by Germany to Finland in early 1918. Around the time that the new Russian government under Lenin were negotiating peace terms with Germany.

Germany got peace in the east, but couldn't send enough of the Divs that had been fighting there to the Western Front to force the issue in France before the US forces started arriving in large numbers. By then Germany also realised that the revolution in Russia could spread across Europe, and revolutionary forces became active inside Germany. The defeat of their offensive on the Western Front, and famine, led to the downfall of the Kaiser and his government.

It's difficult to say what might have happened if Germany had not allowed Lenin's train to cross their territory. Whether France or Italy might have allowed passage. But allowing a train to pass is hardly the same as providing money, men and/or equipment to fight a civil war. It's not like the German's sent a Condor Legion type force to fight for the Reds against the Whites in 1918-1923.
 
  • 1
Reactions: