-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Thats why its strange in IGC. You give Ingermandland and leave Arkhangelsk without a port.
I think that the following things should be fixed:
Arkhangelsk - coastal
Kola - coastal (Murmansk(
Free Novgorod.
Also the caspian provinces should be coastal too.
Anyway I still can't get how you change the Novgorod to be free on start and the game crashes after I alter the provinces file with wordpad.
I think that the following things should be fixed:
Arkhangelsk - coastal
Kola - coastal (Murmansk(
Free Novgorod.
Also the caspian provinces should be coastal too.
Anyway I still can't get how you change the Novgorod to be free on start and the game crashes after I alter the provinces file with wordpad.
Originally posted by VultureGFF
When did they get to the Baltic actually? Ingermanland falls quite fast in most of my games... Especially when I am Russia
After the great nordic war
Last edited:
Originally posted by PatMaster
After the great nordic war
1700-1721. This is the one aspect of the game that the AI averages a better performance than historically at-although it does make it a little historically ridiculous that Russia's required to have a port for colonists-they didn't get to Azov etc. until about the same period. A port in Archangelsk would fix this nicely.
Well as I said... If you bother that much, add the ports in Arghangelsk and the Caspian yourself... Or suggest it to Doomie for the next IGC (if it ever comes out)
Yeah, he once said that 2.3 would be the final version... But later he DID start the 2.4 discussion.. I assume the man doesn't know himself
THE SOLUTION...
...seems fairly evident to me:
Just add a historical event in that time frame that puts a port in that province. Historically accurate and helpful to any Russia that doesn't have a port by 1564 (or whatever the date was).
No need to make things too complicated.
YKOil
...seems fairly evident to me:
Just add a historical event in that time frame that puts a port in that province. Historically accurate and helpful to any Russia that doesn't have a port by 1564 (or whatever the date was).
No need to make things too complicated.
YKOil
Originally posted by BiB
As I just told him
Ok sorry, I will delete that post
Hey BiB, as a moderator, shouldn't you be supposed to bring ppl to not post stupid message like you always do???
Back to topic. A critical question is whether Archangel is "coastal".
Seriously, I've seen Russia do quite well with colonizing Siberia, and I always play with TO owning Ingermannland. I've played 12 hands off with IGC2.3, and a few more with IGC2.0, 2.1 and so on. A big problem is EU1.09. All colonization by the ai is reduced by this patch.
I've seen Russia be very aggressive early and then crippled by its ToT, but still end up colonizing a great deal. I've seen Russia be very passive early, but still end up colonizing a great deal. But, either way, colonization is not going to occur seriously (by the ai), until the mid-1600s. Given PTI, this is historical.
The only problem I see is with EU1.09. It fixed tech progression, but seriously broke colonization.
Seriously, I've seen Russia do quite well with colonizing Siberia, and I always play with TO owning Ingermannland. I've played 12 hands off with IGC2.3, and a few more with IGC2.0, 2.1 and so on. A big problem is EU1.09. All colonization by the ai is reduced by this patch.
I've seen Russia be very aggressive early and then crippled by its ToT, but still end up colonizing a great deal. I've seen Russia be very passive early, but still end up colonizing a great deal. But, either way, colonization is not going to occur seriously (by the ai), until the mid-1600s. Given PTI, this is historical.
The only problem I see is with EU1.09. It fixed tech progression, but seriously broke colonization.