When can we expect more galaxy shapes?

[JMensch]

Yeah. But stating it as absolute fact re "Globular clusters dont support life" rubs me the wrong way. That is your position. Others have differing positions (http://www.space.com/31535-advanced-alien-civilizations-globular-clusters.html).

Even if we did assume that globular clusters are lifeless, they would still add interest to a map. I envision a map area that is much larger than it is currently (but with the same star counts), with a scaled down spiral galaxy in the center, a couple dwarf galaxies near the periphery, and some scattered globular clusters between, linked very sparingly by natural wormholes (or whatever). The result would be something akin to islands and continents in space that still make some scientific sense. I like the idea of the clusters being dead-ends in the natural wormhole network, a wall against which you can put your back during a savage fight, or the lairs of exotic space monsters (akin to void clouds etc) which might naturally prefer such an environment, or some other form of goody hut. You could do a lot with them.

Sorry that science rubs you the wrong way but it is highly, highly, HIGHLY unlikely that life exists in globular clusters. Posting an article by two scientist with just an idea, doesnt make globular clusters habitable. I will say that they could certainly enhance the visual of the galaxy though.

 

[Shermanator]

I want non-galaxy galaxies. I want to be able to play in a map that is only a section on a single spiral arm, for example.

 

[DarthHammer]

We don't even need to use the "it's science fiction" rationale yet, there are several real types of galaxies that we have yet to see.

- Sb and Sc type Spiral galaxies. (We only have the Sa type spiral galaxy, which is an overall elliptical shaped galaxy comprised of 'tightly wound' spiral arms. Sb galaxies have the arms further apart, and Sc galaxies are so 'unwound' that a two armed variety would look like an S shape with the core in the middle.)

- Barred Spiral galaxies. (Same as spirals but with the inner portions of the arms forming straight 'bars' across the core.)

- Shell galaxies. (An elliptical galaxy with it's stars split into concentric rings.)

- Lenticular galaxies. (A cross between spiral and elliptical, I.E. spiral arms with less stars in between but still forming an overall elliptical shape.)

- Irregular galaxies. (Essentially a 'random' option for galaxy shape.)

- Colliding galaxies. (Don't think this one needs explaining.)

 

[Insane Commander]

The Magellanic Clouds would be cool for a visual effect but they're described as gas-rich; and metal-poor. So its doubtful that there's anything close to habitable planets.

Doesn't need to be them, we can play with another group of galaxies.

 

[Roobster88]

We don't even need to use the "it's science fiction" rationale yet, there are several real types of galaxies that we have yet to see.

- Sb and Sc type Spiral galaxies. (We only have the Sa type spiral galaxy, which is an overall elliptical shaped galaxy comprised of 'tightly wound' spiral arms. Sb galaxies have the arms further apart, and Sc galaxies are so 'unwound' that a two armed variety would look like an S shape with the core in the middle.)

- Barred Spiral galaxies. (Same as spirals but with the inner portions of the arms forming straight 'bars' across the core.)

- Shell galaxies. (An elliptical galaxy with it's stars split into concentric rings.)

- Lenticular galaxies. (A cross between spiral and elliptical, I.E. spiral arms with less stars in between but still forming an overall elliptical shape.)

- Irregular galaxies. (Essentially a 'random' option for galaxy shape.)

- Colliding galaxies. (Don't think this one needs explaining.)

Agreed, and barred spiral is in my opinion the top priority so that we can finally play in a galaxy that resembles the Milky Way.

 

[krios41]

Pink Hearts, Yellow Moons, Orange Stars, and Green Clovers!

space pony's
don't forget space pony's!

 

[TestosteroneLol]

Zig Zags. Just Zig Zags.

 

[Pavane]

When NASA finds a new shape of galaxy

Some people seem to be longing for heart or puppy shaped galaxies.

 

[JMensch]

This one would be cool.

View attachment 244003

That just looks like a ring galaxy, which is in the game, but just thicker.

 

[jalapen0]

That just looks like a ring galaxy, which is in the game, but just thicker.

Yup, I deleted my post cause I'm dumb. I didn't even realize that was in the game

 

[Seomis]

I know there is mods for that but I don't like mods since you can't get achievements with them.

 

[Qoff]

Haha you're funny I'll purge you last.

 

[Shermanator]

Guys I know that the globular clusters likely don't have a lot of life in them, but does that really matter for Stellaris? If it gives us more options, is more fun, and makes sense within the context of Stellaris, why should it matter if something is a little bit unrealistic? It have has before.

 

[Qoff]

 

[Pavane]

Here is a short article on galaxy shapes: http://www.universetoday.com/87341/galaxy-shapes/

Scientists have found the longed for heart shaped galaxy:

Alas, no puppy shaped galaxy so far.

 

[anomanderus]

What about satellite galaxies?

But really, Paradox will just release another DLC to fix it at some point.

 

[Eze]

Some people seem to be longing for heart or puppy shaped galaxies.

I think maybe you are kidding, but I would totally play a puppy-shaped galaxy.

My space butterflies will dominate the entirety of the muzzle and the lolling tongue! All shall fear their wrath!

 

[Pavane]

I think maybe you are kidding, but I would totally play a puppy-shaped galaxy.

My space butterflies will dominate the entirety of the muzzle and the lolling tongue! All shall fear their wrath!

I thought that space butterflies were attracted to the other end.

 

[Aries666]

Out of interest is there such a things as a galaxy with 2 perpendicular planes? Impossible to represent as a 2D map but wouldn't it be cool if we could have 3D maps?

Edit: nevermind my google fu is strong today, apparently it is unlikely and would require a galactic collision at a perfect angle and may still merge into a single accretion disc over time anyway.

 

[Arizal]

Out of interest is there such a things as a galaxy with 2 perpendicular planes? Impossible to represent as a 2D map but wouldn't it be cool if we could have 3D maps?

Edit: nevermind my google fu is strong today, apparently it is unlikely and would require a galactic collision at a perfect angle and may still merge into a single accretion disc over time anyway.

SotS had 3D maps, and when I think about it, it might not be that difficult to do with Stellaris, since we already have 3D maps. The only thing missing are paths between different planes of stars. As long as we cannot go in the dark space between the stars, it shouldn't be that demanding. At least, I think it wouldn't be.