Is there a reasoning behind this, or does anyone else have the same experience?
Back in 1.2, I was playing as Champassak (start date 1700 or 1701 I think) and Zhou remained as an OPM in Macau. (I'm sure it was dev oversight; I don't know if they still exist there) for whatever reason Zhou set me as a rival and continued to sow dissent, sabotage reputation and embargo me (though the last didn't hurt) and I couldn't do a damn thing against it since they were married/allied to the mega Qing.
The same thing happened yesterday as Moldavia (somehow independent as OPM in the province Moldavia) did the same to me, Candar. I really didn't want to bother moving into that general vicinity but I just had to, otherwise I couldn't integrate Persia. Sabotage reputation plus neighboring heretic religion made it impossible to integrate them, so I just had to kill it off and demand total annexation. I converted and sold it to Crimea just to forget about it.
Not trying to show off, but..
(Zhou still exists in Macau, though it's too small you can't see the name. The second screenshot shows Moldavia.)
I think I usually understand the rivalry. They think of you as a rival when they think you're about even, and want to knock you down a bit to remove current and/or future competitors and change it to other attitudes when the gap becomes large. Mamluks rivaled me early in the game as Candar but changed to friendly as they were slowly getting conquered by the Ottomans. Crimea set me as a rival for a long time as well, but they turned threatened.
What I do not understand is how the OPMs (like Zhou and Moldavia in these cases) thought of me as a rival. Perhaps they take their alliances into account when they set rivals? Zhou had Qing, and Moldavia had.. Lithuania.
edit: Just to clarify, I did annex Moldavia and sold it to Crimea so that I could integrate Persia. It shows I'm integrating Persia but Moldavia is still there. They must have revolted back.
Back in 1.2, I was playing as Champassak (start date 1700 or 1701 I think) and Zhou remained as an OPM in Macau. (I'm sure it was dev oversight; I don't know if they still exist there) for whatever reason Zhou set me as a rival and continued to sow dissent, sabotage reputation and embargo me (though the last didn't hurt) and I couldn't do a damn thing against it since they were married/allied to the mega Qing.
The same thing happened yesterday as Moldavia (somehow independent as OPM in the province Moldavia) did the same to me, Candar. I really didn't want to bother moving into that general vicinity but I just had to, otherwise I couldn't integrate Persia. Sabotage reputation plus neighboring heretic religion made it impossible to integrate them, so I just had to kill it off and demand total annexation. I converted and sold it to Crimea just to forget about it.
Not trying to show off, but..
(Zhou still exists in Macau, though it's too small you can't see the name. The second screenshot shows Moldavia.)
I think I usually understand the rivalry. They think of you as a rival when they think you're about even, and want to knock you down a bit to remove current and/or future competitors and change it to other attitudes when the gap becomes large. Mamluks rivaled me early in the game as Candar but changed to friendly as they were slowly getting conquered by the Ottomans. Crimea set me as a rival for a long time as well, but they turned threatened.
What I do not understand is how the OPMs (like Zhou and Moldavia in these cases) thought of me as a rival. Perhaps they take their alliances into account when they set rivals? Zhou had Qing, and Moldavia had.. Lithuania.
edit: Just to clarify, I did annex Moldavia and sold it to Crimea so that I could integrate Persia. It shows I'm integrating Persia but Moldavia is still there. They must have revolted back.
Last edited: