Only AI units gain org. while retreating AFAIK. The reason for this is obvious; AI is dumb and need buffs.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Only AI units gain org. while retreating AFAIK. The reason for this is obvious; AI is dumb and need buffs.
Both AI & Humans reorganize when retreating. It's a negative feedback system that prevents unrealistic defensive collapse. Alternatively, once a force reaches 5 org (the retreat breakpoint), it can never fight back against a pursuing enemy, which is unrealistic. This bonus is an abstraction that allows combat to work quasi-realistically, as is organization and morale, and combat values, etc...
I wish theyd allow org regain on move, a modder hacked the exe to allow it. Might as well make it possible in the misc.txt file.
I agree with reservations. It's one of the most annoying+unrealistic things to have a division stop my 24-man stack marching through Siberia just bc their org is low. You can deal with that with 'support attack', but even then, the first wave of troops could be routed by a corps in a day's worth of battle. It's an issue in all large-province sections of the map.
However, moving units shouldn't reorg to full org... there are supply difficulties with armies on the move, there are bottlenecks, unit delays (a division isn't a single block of 13k men moving in a column) etc. and it doesn't make sense for units to reorg to full as-if they were reorging out-of-combat on the frontline or at base.
Not sure if this is a glitch. When I start as Spain in 1933, most of my tech team is gone by 1935. Not events reminded me when they are gone. Weird.
Since I have finished the translation of the new strings in French, this should answer your question. (But I was lucky enough to have the time to allocate to this heavy task)
I am not sure that I understand your point. The team already has some volunteers. When they are available, it makes sense to rely on the same persons already used to the terminology and the localization tricks. (If you are interested, I suggest reading Localization vs translation)
I was part of the translators, didnt know you had official translators.
For which language? It's better to ask the same person anyway, as Lucifer explained.
And release a patch with buttons and events without text? Not a great idea.
Yes, it is no reasonable, no more than painting the walls of a house not built yet if you will allow me this metaphor.
I literally did 1 line of French
But I was more involved in the pre-'Darkest Hour' period.
Last edited:
I literally did 1 line of French
Well, it's better to let only 1 person work on the translation, if he/she is available. If you use multiple persons, you risk having inconsistencies: that's why we use that only as last resort if there are no other options available.
Last edited:
...and that's why I am revisiting all I can from the previous French translations (a daunting task).
Well, it's better to let only 1 person work on the translation, if he/she is available. If you use multiple persons, you risk having inconsistencies: that's why we use that only as last resort if there are no other options available.
And again that doesn't make sense. I am sure the french/italian/spanish/german/polish/russian players would not appreciate a patch that adds new buttons and events without text. It would only cause troubles and confusion.