What needs to be fixed in HTTT

[unmerged(64629)]

No it wasn't... If your ally DoW somebody w/o having a CB you do get a -2 Stab for DoWing w/o a CB.

As for my own suggestions:

1) Please make it so than the AI cares about relations as much as you do. Right now it's a Dog eat dog world and the only guy giving gift and otherwise boosting relations is you... would be nice if I was playing as Italy and France or Tyrol or whatever gave you some gifts to boost the relationship once in a while... Kinda tiresome to feel like your the only guy who cares...

2) Make the AI smarter a DoWing other AIs... how many times have I seen a minor country DoW a major simply because it has some province close to him that are undefended... It's so easy to cart enough troop by sea or by mil access but the AI don't realize this and get owned everytime (often even if I'm allied with them and doing more than my share of the work).

3) As I said in another thread, I'd like it if the AI could aim for a more compacted empire instead of bits and pieces everywhere... it might boost it tax and income a little but ultimatly weaken them... meaning tons of revolts that they can't do anything about and doom stacks that are stuck uselessly in the middle of nowhere. There's a reason human players usually expand their borders rather than grabbing everything they can. (Unless they are doing a WC?).

But beyond that I agree with the Province decision filter and would also like a country decision filter too (but not expecting one) because who in their right mind would enact the Importation decision for exemple.

I also agree with the critisms of the CB system (wich I love) but while I would like to get less of a penalty for giving land to an ally, I don't think that it being free (I.e.: 0BB for the negociator) would work either as it would be far too open to gaming... Making it something like half the BB would work fine and encourage me at least to care for my allies in a war.

 

[Raventhefuhrer]

Reading through the first page I would like to add that I too think that Regency Councils are far too common, and it's annoying that my heirs all seem to at age 14 from a 'horse-riding' accident or some other dumb thing and in the meantime my king wasn't popping out ten other kids, as usually happened historically. Regency councils should be much rarer, and exist for only a couple of years while an adolescent comes of age. Most of the time they're for when your original heir dies, then your king dies, and your new heir is only one or two years old.

 

[gardel va]

I'd also like to see a way for non-Western countries to convert Shia-to-Sunni (or vice versa), Confucian-to-Buddhist (or vice versa), etc., by decision, like Christian countries can to move among Catholic, Reformed, and Protestant.

 

[Alerias]

I agree that as the negotiator you should not incur the penalties of the beneficiary.

This!

If I use precious warscore as alliance leader to give a province to an ally of mine, that ally should incur the infamy.

 

[HNT]

The HRE should be at least 18 years old. It's historically accurate. In my current game a Bohemian boy of 7 is HRE.

 

[anomanderus]

I'd also like to see a way for non-Western countries to convert Shia-to-Sunni (or vice versa), Confucian-to-Buddhist (or vice versa), etc., by decision, like Christian countries can to move among Catholic, Reformed, and Protestant.

This. Also, where is our Sikhism, Paradox. You said there would be Sikhism!
And Judaism or at least Judaism "persecute dem Jews/give asylum to dem Jews" decisions would be cool. It's like hitler built a time machine or something. Red Alert 2 and all that, wot wot?

 

[anomanderus]

Particularist Universalis THREE: Particularists Particularly Particulate Particularism

This. TOO MANY PARTICULARISTS, ALL THE TIME.

 

[anomanderus]

This. Also, where is our Sikhism, Paradox. You said there would be Sikhism!
And Judaism or at least Judaism "persecute dem Jews/give asylum to dem Jews" decisions would be cool. It's like hitler built a time machine or something. Red Alert 2 and all that, wot wot?

Also, to do with religion. I get that eastern religions never had holy wars, but at least change it so that hindu theocrats are Brahmins, not Archbishops. Tianzi for Confucian, Tensho for Shinto. And make it so that Muslim Bhutan can't get the Lama title if they are also a theocracy. Also Pagans should be High Priest, not Archbishop.

 

[anomanderus]

This. Also, where is our Sikhism, Paradox. You said there would be Sikhism!
And Judaism or at least Judaism "persecute dem Jews/give asylum to dem Jews" decisions would be cool. It's like hitler built a time machine or something. Red Alert 2 and all that, wot wot?

Right now I really hope paradox doesn't ban people for mentioning hitler.

 

[Zakuno2]

One thing annoys me and that is one of the missions you get. The "Our neighbor is a jerk." Mission. Declare war and gain a core. So I declare war with no CB half of the time and it immediately gives me a reconquest CB on the nation. I just wish I could get that CB as soon as the mission fires.