Assimilation is a mess atm.
The point of assimilation is to become a part of the nation. This happens with or without discrimination.
One side is the obvious example of New World, US, etc.
The opposite side of it are discriminating societies. Germans discriminated Poles in Reich, leaving them only option to join the ruling group to be promoted into middle and upper classes. French did same + their literacy program did a major job at erasing regional differences. In Russian Empire, many tribal leaders, sheikhs and princes (in Caucasus as example, but colonial German migration was also a factor) basically russified. How did that matter? You could together discrimate against "losers" and reap rewards from them, creating a healthy and strong middle/upper class and capitals.
I fear that this isn't fully fleshed out yet. This kind of internal social dynamic is what needed for it and for assimilation to matter.
The point of assimilation is to become a part of the nation. This happens with or without discrimination.
One side is the obvious example of New World, US, etc.
The opposite side of it are discriminating societies. Germans discriminated Poles in Reich, leaving them only option to join the ruling group to be promoted into middle and upper classes. French did same + their literacy program did a major job at erasing regional differences. In Russian Empire, many tribal leaders, sheikhs and princes (in Caucasus as example, but colonial German migration was also a factor) basically russified. How did that matter? You could together discrimate against "losers" and reap rewards from them, creating a healthy and strong middle/upper class and capitals.
I fear that this isn't fully fleshed out yet. This kind of internal social dynamic is what needed for it and for assimilation to matter.
- 5
- 2