this one is more clear than the wiki mess...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-w6adqR4eL...AAAc/Iz82_ZXHGTE/s1600/Lancaster+and+York.gif
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-w6adqR4eL...AAAc/Iz82_ZXHGTE/s1600/Lancaster+and+York.gif
Well, I said they're all Plantagenets.i think its quite simple:
trunk: plantegenets - branch A - Lancasters
- branch B -Yorks
Yea, Louis 16 was more or less a stand-in for the institution of monarchy as a whole, so he likely was named "Capet" to draw attention to that. I don't think the revolutionaries were particularly interested in the fineries of dynastic nomenclature.I guess that the reason why Louis XVI just got named Louis Capet after he abdicated was a symbol to show that King or not he was just a normal French and not a privilegied noble.
As "of a place" was often an indication of noble lineage so Louis of Bourbon was probably not kindly seen in Revolutionnary France.
The thing with House's name is just to highlight that they are other dynasty member that are not part of that specific Branch.
House of Bourbon is Capetian but not all Capetian are Bourbon this avoid confusion when different House interact with each others like Valois and Burgundy for exemple.
Likewise now they are Bourbon of Spain, Bourbon of Orléans (or simply of Orléans), Bourbon-Parma and many other branches of House of Bourbon with itself is just a part of the Capetians dynasty.
So to answer why Bourbon did not style themselve as Capet ?
Well they are. The true name of the House is Capetians House of Bourbon not just House of Bourbon.
I guess that the reason why Louis XVI just got named Louis Capet after he abdicated was a symbol to show that King or not he was just a normal French and not a privilegied noble.
As "of a place" was often an indication of noble lineage so Louis of Bourbon was probably not kindly seen in Revolutionnary France.