NOOO..!
It is? Ah, you got another noob-rules here. Wait a sec, lemme re-skim the first page.
*a moment later*
It's not against the rules. It's just not counted.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
*a moment later*
It's not against the rules. It's just not counted.
I guess it's a dead-end, yes, you are right, Lord_D.
I always love using sacrificial tactic, so goodbye, my dear wolf fellows. I will take randakar's offer and hold the Cross until deadline comes even if I ended up dying.
..does that count now?
Eh? There's a serious loop-hole in the rules if that is so. Imagine a scenario where everyone voted for themselves. What would happen then?
Ok, they do count as invalid, but invalid vote = no vote => substitution/auto-lynch
Ok, they do count as invalid, but invalid vote = no vote => substitution/auto-lynch
Hey, don't you dare to go on and blame votes on me!
Take up responsibilities for your deeds, and follow your instincts, as it was already said... and mine tell me we might have a wolf victory tomorrow.
Take up responsibilities for your deeds, and follow your instincts, as it was already said... and mine tell me we might have a wolf victory tomorrow.
So you say you are a wolf?
Ok, so we lynch you before night falls, you die, the cross goes to somebody else. Easily fixed.
Unvote Saintis
Vote cobaltblue
You know, my last PM is to crosscheck your status, reis. Sorry to play around with you a bit.
And that invalid vote is to voice my current suspicion - it's Saintis.
I agree.
But thanks for the bandwagon, gentlemen. That's what I've expected since first round. It finally comes.
Now lets see how it turns out..
Well, I hate this kind of thing to be fair. On the one hand she says she wants to look suspicious for reasons she doesn't deem to specify, on the other she says something like this .. what am I supposed to think here, really?
If cobalt really is a goodie I will be rather annoyed, I will tell you that.
If she really is a wolf - well, in that case: Nice try. It's been a honor crossing swords with you.
If cobalt really is a goodie I will be rather annoyed, I will tell you that.
If she really is a wolf - well, in that case: Nice try. It's been a honor crossing swords with you.
Last edited:
The whole reason is to let the Cross out of your sight, randakar. I've told you.
Someone else from goodies should analyze much more than you do, then you both should team up and solve the rest.
..wait. Maybe I should read how it works first.
Someone else from goodies should analyze much more than you do, then you both should team up and solve the rest.
..wait. Maybe I should read how it works first.
Now are you a wolf or aren't you? One second you're behaving like a rational villager and the next you could not act more wolfish if you grew fangs and teeth and started howling at the moon ..
edit: You're right about needing to do analysis.
reis91 said:
I highly doubt it. Jonti died last deadline, and the deadline before that we had only 3 wolves. The rules say the village will not have parity against it until at least 4 days have passed, even if no wolf is lynched. We had two nights with no-hunts. Trespoe was supposed to turn on night 4.
We should have at least another day .. maybe two.
edit: deadline has passed, hasn't it?
Seems deadline has passed, so I'd say, I'm not wolf. Lynch Saintis next.
Sorry for using this dumb tactic but I want to lure out at least one wolf since my role is not that important than the rest of alive goodies.
Sorry for using this dumb tactic but I want to lure out at least one wolf since my role is not that important than the rest of alive goodies.
Why do this? If cobaltblue was a wolf, I'd be dead, buried and decomposed by now...
If you really were lynched (didn't track the votecount, so I'm not 100% sure) you should stop saying game related things now. Sorry.
A few points: (Don't answer any of this if you're dead ..)
- Did you really want to die here or what? Why on earth did you say something *that* silly?
- Saintis - yeah, well. Sure thing. I didn't need any bigger hints than you've given me already.
- You expected a bandwagon on you? Why?
- I like your activity level, it's been a pleasure to play this game with you - BUT - for the love of god, don't go saying things like that to me next time. Catch me at the wrong time and you simply risk me taking you seriously..
edit:
And how is the rest of the vllage supposed to know that?
This is werewolf. Paranoia is part and parcel of it. Trust noone is a werewolf creed. I took him seriously there. Sorry.
Hm, since I haven't been a ghost officially, ..just want to say one-two words about those I want to trust now after watching how this voting going.
Reis, Kaetje, randakar, Lord_D, and Slinky. I coud be wrong. But ask randakar for further guidance, I think. To tell the truth, I didn't trust randakar until he voted for me.
About those questions above, lets save it for later - I will answer when this game ends
Reis, Kaetje, randakar, Lord_D, and Slinky. I coud be wrong. But ask randakar for further guidance, I think. To tell the truth, I didn't trust randakar until he voted for me.
About those questions above, lets save it for later - I will answer when this game ends
I'm probably the one to blame, even though I didn't meant exactly this.
I suggested looking at the bandwagons as the best way to figure out pack behavior, and cobalt decided to provide more data. Thing is, I already had my suspicions, which were confirmed. And if cobalt truly is innocent, which I'm 100% confident, we could have used his vote. Also, I'm waiting to see what happens to the cross, which was another bad move, of which I am sadly responsible.
Believe cobalt is still able to post, until EL makes his post with the count, but correct me if wrong. And cobalt, don't be so quick to trust. I recall having said specifically that I didn't tell you anything that could make you be 100% sure about me. Quoting Slinky from memory, from the WW rules thread
I suggested looking at the bandwagons as the best way to figure out pack behavior, and cobalt decided to provide more data. Thing is, I already had my suspicions, which were confirmed. And if cobalt truly is innocent, which I'm 100% confident, we could have used his vote. Also, I'm waiting to see what happens to the cross, which was another bad move, of which I am sadly responsible.
Believe cobalt is still able to post, until EL makes his post with the count, but correct me if wrong. And cobalt, don't be so quick to trust. I recall having said specifically that I didn't tell you anything that could make you be 100% sure about me. Quoting Slinky from memory, from the WW rules thread
I don't trust you shortly, Reis. That's why I was still playing around with you - and yeah, this also applies on randakar. I need to crosscheck the person for several times. If someone suspect you being wolf on PM, it's very likely that he is an innocent.
So that is just list of people I want to trust and cooperate with for the next vote. However, I am sure this logic is still lack of something so combining these information with what other goodies have might lead us somewhere else.
Well, hope so.
But still, there is one horror left - you trust me too much without any basis, Reis. It could be your intuition - or else, you are one of the baddies hence you can confirm my innocence easily.
But regardless of that slight possibility, I still want to put you on that list for the next day.
So that is just list of people I want to trust and cooperate with for the next vote. However, I am sure this logic is still lack of something so combining these information with what other goodies have might lead us somewhere else.
Well, hope so.
But still, there is one horror left - you trust me too much without any basis, Reis. It could be your intuition - or else, you are one of the baddies hence you can confirm my innocence easily.
But regardless of that slight possibility, I still want to put you on that list for the next day.
Good, you're thinking more like me now.
But I never told you anything about myself now, did I? What do you really know about me? So, my trust of you got no practical gains for you, apart from not voting on you....
But I never told you anything about myself now, did I? What do you really know about me? So, my trust of you got no practical gains for you, apart from not voting on you....