Really? No other candidates? Just one big bandwagon?
Trespoe looks like the best candidate to me, out of about 10-12 decent candidates, largely due to how the Yakman lynch went down - no real struggle by anyone, including Yakman, no real attempt to swing votes towards trespoe - as well as trespoe being one of the late non-Kriszo voters in the first. Nothing suggests he wouldn't go well in a pack with either of the two. That said, there's still nothing so glaring pointing at him that there should be no debate and no dissent. What's with the rest of you?
I don't want to see any more votes in the style of rexodia's or Emperor Walter's. If you want to vote trespoe, that's fine. But from here on, we need reasons. Piling the whole village's vote on an un-outed person wouldn't be that constructive even if he did turn out to be evil; and if he wasn't evil, it'd be wasting a whole lynch.
I do play chicken with my allies at times. But I would never just passively peel my vote off of him and leave it there. I would either a) switch to another target and make a case for why he's a better lynch or for why all the votes on Yakman make him look innocent; b) try an AOK patented mass vote switch (which isn't my style); c) keep my vote on Yakman and pray for a good hunt. I wouldn't draw attention to myself while doing nothing constructive to help the packmate I endangered by breaking a tie in his disfavor. I'm neither an idiot, a noob, nor a $#!++y packmate.
Trespoe looks like the best candidate to me, out of about 10-12 decent candidates, largely due to how the Yakman lynch went down - no real struggle by anyone, including Yakman, no real attempt to swing votes towards trespoe - as well as trespoe being one of the late non-Kriszo voters in the first. Nothing suggests he wouldn't go well in a pack with either of the two. That said, there's still nothing so glaring pointing at him that there should be no debate and no dissent. What's with the rest of you?
I don't want to see any more votes in the style of rexodia's or Emperor Walter's. If you want to vote trespoe, that's fine. But from here on, we need reasons. Piling the whole village's vote on an un-outed person wouldn't be that constructive even if he did turn out to be evil; and if he wasn't evil, it'd be wasting a whole lynch.
wow ... the wolves are in force here....
Vote Thistletooth
he unvoted Yakman yesterday in a late attempt to save him.
which is a better reason than 5 quick votes on me ...
gee, he is also in the middle of this bandwagon, too!
I do play chicken with my allies at times. But I would never just passively peel my vote off of him and leave it there. I would either a) switch to another target and make a case for why he's a better lynch or for why all the votes on Yakman make him look innocent; b) try an AOK patented mass vote switch (which isn't my style); c) keep my vote on Yakman and pray for a good hunt. I wouldn't draw attention to myself while doing nothing constructive to help the packmate I endangered by breaking a tie in his disfavor. I'm neither an idiot, a noob, nor a $#!++y packmate.