Maybe I am just suspicious of people who sign up and then seem to not even actually play the game. Just wanting to survive the game doesn't seem like a good enough excuse to join.
No but it doesn't make them more likely to be baddies either. OTOH if you have no decent lead you might want to dump some dead weight rather than risk losing someone that can help. The problem is the "vote the inactive" is often something baddies do when they want to draw attention away from a packmate. But then again you can't let all the inactives be taboo for voting. Arghhhh!
It seems that most MoDs are also SA, so he could have been trying to get some info that way and even if he is a MoD it doesn't clear him, the rules clearly state that MoD may be a baddie. We have not seen any yet but we have only gotten two out of maybe ten baddies.
I didn't think about the SA thing! *slaps forehead*
humancalculator is the only one on my list who voted for someone who then got hunted, which helps his defense as why vote for someone you know will be hunted anyway but why the ForzaA vote? I am not entirely sure on J. Passepartout, but nothing that says goodie really, he did vote for jonti-h fairly early but may be from the other pack.
Usually there is two packs but so far we've only seen one. If this is a one pack setup that could explain the lack of dead baddies (there would be fewer of them but also there would be no intrapack fighting).
My reasoning was he voted two goodies, then voted jonti-h when it was appearent he would die anyway, maybe after jonti-h told his pack to save themselves? From then on has voted EUROO7 and is basically trying to completely discredit Ironhead 5.
I guess.
Did you ever notice the tendency of wolves to vote for themselves?
Hm, yes. And walrus did do that earlier, didn't he? I see your point.
I did look at both of you but decided that neither of you had much evidence against you. There are two or three others that I am mildly suspicious of but evidence is lacking.
Two or three more!? That means you suspect everyone except me and EURO - including yourself! I think this must be a new Werewolf paranoia record.
In my analysis votes for Lemeard by other wolf candidates did not count for much as Lemeard may not have been in contact with any pack.
Probably correct since lovers can only be detected by the sorcerer and he had to make contact with a wolves' helper who also had to have made contact with the wolves. Pretty unlikely. And since jonti never confessed to being a baddie I don't think they would have gotten contact that way either but who knows.
Also, there seems to be quite a bit of metagaming going on, which is basically to be expected for the first one or two lynches because there really isn't much else to go on but should have died off well before now. On the other hand the set-up of this game doesn't really make what evidence we do get from scans all that reliable as the person may be MoD. EUROO7 may often be extremely successful at misleading the voting, and may be doing so this time but as of yet I have seen no decent evidence against him.
You're right * 3.
As you say, may be he is just playing lightheartedly. I for one don't take claims of innocence to have much weight anyway.
You'd be surprised at how unwilling people are to flat out lie (even in games like this when it's all about lying). I guess I'll even base my vote on this even if I wish I had something more substantial to go by
vote snoopdogg
