Unvoting EURO does not a werewolf make. Rather someone of AOK's skill would leave a vote in place surely?
And before you leap on me, remember Lemeard last game.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Unvoting EURO does not a werewolf make. Rather someone of AOK's skill would leave a vote in place surely?
And before you leap on me, remember Lemeard last game.
He is doing with TT did; hiding himself behind the mantra of being a pro which never, ever makes noob errors, neither of mistake, nor deliberately.
You are seeming very certain here. Are you in contact with the seer or something?
Does careful analyses and confidence in them make one in the contact with the seer? No, not necessarily.
But the analysis seems rather less than a complete case, hence my question.
If I though you would take a break from not thinking, I would link to a game or two that AOK has played in the past to show you how silly your little theory is. The crappy thing is I don't think you are a wolf, just misguided.
For now I am going to vote Byakhiam. He made the 5th vote on EURO on day 1, when no one else had more than 2 votes (Teep). He was also extremely quick to change from Teep to AOK yesterday. If there was a veteran in the wolfpack with some sense of honor that didn't want to hunt AOK too early, getting him lynched in that situation would probably be the best case scenario.
Vote Byakhiam
I am trying to figure out why no one even seemed to try and break the first day tie to save Euro. Maybe it was because when Euro and Teep were tied, some wolf or wolves had already voted the second candidate and couldn't do anything more. Those players were: hdk, Steed and Lemeard. Then we've also got the below votes to consider. It seems HJ Tulp and Lemeard brought up myself and Lalalilo to three votes when Euro had four. It could have been a way to "save" Euro. Hence there are atleast four candidates to look more closely at, if my thinking is not completely off.
And then also the last minute snipe from HJ Tulp, which the_hdk apparently talked about yesterday. No, this is no definitive proof in either way. I have also seen villagers breaking a tie in similar fashion, and thereby unknowingly saved a baddie, but atleast it's something concrete to go on.
Therefore I vote the tulip.
Vote HJ Tulp
And then also the last minute snipe from HJ Tulp, which the_hdk apparently talked about yesterday. No, this is no definitive proof in either way. I have also seen villagers breaking a tie in similar fashion, and thereby unknowingly saved a baddie, but atleast it's something concrete to go on.
Therefore I vote the tulip.
Vote HJ Tulp
The only reason I voted HC at that moment was because AOK made him the designated target. If you ask me it's time to see what he is really made of.
VOTE AOK
VOTE AOK
If there is no case against AOK there is certainly no case against me.
The case has so far revolved about the usage of PMs. Have you got anything else you want to point to?
He led attacks on goodies two times in a row. One of them almost saving a wolf. I don't buy the PM-nonsense as Skarion was talking rubbish.
Actually, he didn't. I signalled that I'd follow AOK when he asked if there were people willing and able to do some late minute investigating. If you just look at my votes and posts to try and make me a wolf then indeed, I look somewhat suspicious. However, if you read the posts around that you'll see that I merely followed the directions of AOK. Therefor, if the actions of AOK are not suspicious to you then mine can't either.
Sure. I mean, why learn from history when you can make the same mistake over and over again?