-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It was simply very clear from his reaction, i didn't know for sure, and by the way, I did relent towards the end, so I'm wondering why nobody has questioned me as I'm far from obviously a villager, it seems like a wolf thing to do, say you trust me implicitly and then turn on me later when I don't deliver, never mind joeb, you've just ensured that the wolves will hunt me tonight
As for people jumping on the EURO wagon, why didn't you say something yesterday if it was so darn obvious?, I'll forgive Don Quixote as its his first game and he could be forgiven for trying to lynch someone who lynched a goodie, but Nautilu should know better if hes a villager
This still doesn't answer the question of why okyriosy, but yes I agree, he does look suspicious, I think we should run him and Nau up, as the wolves as a single entity have been very hard to read thus far and I don't think we'll be able to get three candidates up there
No, you're opinion of this WWL is that it's bullshit. Nothing wrong with it other than my shoddy GM'ing.
o
Don't reply to him, it will only make him post more.How come you disappear for a few days, then the moment you get subbed out you return to completely spam out the thread
As I have no one better at this stage I see no harm in running okyriosy and Nautilu up both see viable lynchs at this stage.
Vote okyriosy
Vote okyriosy
Vote Don Quixote,
Due to a GM mistake we know that he is a wolf(Hax can't sub back in, thus he had a special role), sorry but that is how it happens sometimes...
Due to a GM mistake we know that he is a wolf(Hax can't sub back in, thus he had a special role), sorry but that is how it happens sometimes...
Day 3 - 2 Hours Remaining
nautilu (4) - joebthegreat, Slinky, Lord Strange, the_hdk
okyriosy (3) - marty99, The_Split, jester180
EUROO7 (2) - Nautilu, Don Qvixote
joebthegreat (1) - EUROO7
punkbob (1) - The Arch Mede
Lord Strange (1) - okyriosy
Don Quixote (1) - punkbob
@punkbob - Hax's original character is technically still alive, so he can't sub back in as he was previously subbed out. Or at least, thats how I rule it.
Edit: Updated to include posts #216 and #217
Last edited:
Anyone want to try the switcharoo? Get the wolves off their comfort zone?
Unvote Split
Vote joeb
Unvote Split
Vote joeb
yes players can't sub back in when their original char is still alive
btw
unvote archie
vote nau
TIE-breaker
btw
unvote archie
vote nau
TIE-breaker
It was simply very clear from his reaction, i didn't know for sure, and by the way, I did relent towards the end, so I'm wondering why nobody has questioned me as I'm far from obviously a villager, it seems like a wolf thing to do, say you trust me implicitly and then turn on me later when I don't deliver, never mind joeb, you've just ensured that the wolves will hunt me tonight
Haven't we already had this discussion about over-analyzing everything? Why don't you calm down and let this game play out the way it plays out? You can analyze to figure out who might be a wolf, but there's no point worrying if in doing so you're going to get hunted, scanned, lynched, or molested by a travelling midget carnival.
If anything your overreaction makes you look more suspicious, but you always find some way to act suspicious, so whatever.
marty99 said:
He didn't disappear for a few days. We had two deadlines in one 24 hour period and he was only online for the FIRST deadline. He probably came back the same time he usually does every day to find out there was another deadline that he had no physical capability of reaching.
That's why there should always be a 24 hour period OR GREATER inbetween deadlines. I'd be pissed off too.
@punkbob: the GM said hax can't sub back in because the person who subbed for hax is still playing and hax would know that person's role. Usually people who get subbed out for inactivity can't sub back in anyway so your argument is based on nothing that ever happens in games.
@EURO: If you're going to do one of your "switcheroos" will you at least TRY to put an argument behind why the person is suspicious? Your switcheroos always cause confusion anyway, confusion that kills villagers.