It's all right, we all have times when we can't be as active as we want to be, and that thread, although not game-related, does back up your claim that you really didn't have a lot of time yesterday, as opposed to a matter of choice based on your roleHello, everyone.
First, I apologize for not being around yesterday - I was busy yesterday and today until now. If you want evidence, see the FTG link in my Sig, in which thread I have not replied to for around 36 hours, despite the poster being very helpful.
I guessed that, and I completely understand your reasoningAs to the question of whether I am quieter as a wolf - yes, I am. It's a very annoying baddie tell that still persists, despite strenuous efforts to avoid it.
Now, I will confess that my vote of yesterday on Hax was not completely random. My reasoning is not that hard to guess, and no, it doesn't have to do with his claim of being a villager. It has more to do with his being around, if you get my drift.
You flatter me sirNow, Marty is a great analyzer, and this statement, made nearly a day before deadline, simply does not fit him trying to ping the wolves. It is similar to the tell of avoiding TIEs, but regardless, it's not clear at all why Marty said something like this - for BS justifications, people hardly use justifications that could be misinterpreted as actually being true justifications. And plus, there's nothing wrong with retaliation.
Even if I was, it's kinda hard to ping the wolves halfway through the first day
My vote on jonti was really little more than a random vote I confess, but where possible I always try to put a bit of a case, as sometimes wolves use my reasoning as an excuse to bandwagon whoever I vote for, and I've caught a few that way. It was unlikely in a game of this size and with this quality of players that that would happen, but there was no harm in trying.
As to avoiding TIE's, usually I am one of the least concerned in breaking TIE's, I don't deliberately aim for them, and if I'm online at the deadline to break them I probably will, but otherwise I usually just let the voting flow.
However at this stage there was 4-5 people leading with just one vote each, and this is bad not only for a TIE but also because it makes it nearly impossible to analyze later. It's far better to have 2-3 candidates being run up, and my vote on jonti was intended to start that process, and in fairness it worked, after that there weren't any throwaway votes
Indeed, that was a pretty monstrous supposition on Slinky's part and I found it odd myselfYes. A wolfpack from not even two days of posts. No credible analysis of accusations. In fact, no analysis whatsoever of accusations. And it seems like you just tried to pick these names randomly from a list. #2, #7, and #11 - very evenly spread out, which is what someone choosing randomly would fallaciously select.
I have seen wolves before name a so-called pack, and then deliberately leave them alive until later in the game to back up their claim and when it gets near parity lynch one of them
You make that sound wolfish, but IMHO this particular part of Slinky's behaviour could just be coincidence, while accusing Slinky for not voting you is very nobly un-biased on your part, I don't think it makes him a more likely wolfYou have no evidence whatsoever, and might as well just be throwing names out to say something. Plus, if you thought us three were the wolves (and if you actually name a pack, you'd better have some amount of evidence), then you should vote me and not Trespoe, as I am more likely to be lynched. But this way, you're better able to switch to your primary opponent, in case you start accumulating votes. Plus, your vote switching yesterday, despite your protestations to the contrary, have done nothing useful, but rather sowed confusion into the village, as well as make it harder to read your own actions.
A lot of your analysis seems to hinge on the assumption that wolves plan their votes and actions in general more than villagers, and while this is sometimes true, a lot of the time wolves don't think who they are voting for, as long as it's not an endangered packmate
But anyway, my vote on you served it's purpose, to get you to talk more.
I won't vote Lord_D, because he was run up yesterday also and this is his first Lite game back for God knows how long. I don't want to vote AVN or Trespoe because they are very useful analysers and have already shown they are active and putting reason into their votes. If I voted Slinky - who is already in the lead - it would be a bandwagon and also he just defended himself well.
EDIT: Slinky has two votes I thought he had three, but my second point stands.
That leaves only one person who has any votes on him.
Unvote Jamie550 Vote CCA
I don't find him inherently suspicious, but he hasn't done anything of note this game, and this is maybe the only way of getting information about him.
Last edited: