Werewolf Lite CLXXXV: The muppets

[CCA]

Vote AVN.

 

[trespoe]

Real update's up. Comments are welcome

vunderffool. zee updetes ere-a ixectly es I vuoold hefe-a vreettee zeem. zeey ere-a poore-a guld. Yuoo shuoold hefe-a my cheeldree.
Bork Bork Bork!

For now I will vote Slinky. He changed his vote several times yesterday, without giving any explanation. I hope this will be an incentive for him to talk a little bit more today.

I am trying the Eternaly_Lost spreadsheet. I noticed that too. No reasons for his votes or CCA's (tho he is new)

You have school in August?
Allow me to laugh heartlessly at your misfortune
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA..*cough* *ack* ha ha

EDIT: Does anyone know what he playes like as a wolf, does he usually try and lie low or does he just act normally?

No clue. He did promise that he was going to start playing a few games back, and analyze more.

For now I shall vote Lord D as he jumped on poor reincarnated Walrus.

He didn't even let the Walrus blubber get cold before jumping him again.

said the bishop to the actress.

 

[EUROO7]

... or CCA's (tho he is new)

No he's not.

 

[trespoe]

wow, the votes are spread out....

AVN has 2 votes
Slinky, Lord D, jamie, trespoe, and Walrus v2 all have 1 vote.

Of those who have votes:
AVN wanted to prevent a tie. that would only work if he and jonti were packmates.

JDMS was inactive; would he have been inactive if he was a wolf? dunno on that.

jamie is quiet but I just don't have a handle yet. He was the third voter on Hax, and made the three way tie between Hax, Walrus, and jonti-h.

Lord D seems to give me an odd vibe. Maybe it is just his rhino butt. I don't like big butts, I cannot lie. He also voted me at one time. Yet he also broke the tie yesterday against Walrus (the third vote).

Slinky did switch twice and also voted me at one time. All of his votes made ties yesterday. The four way,a five way, and a double with jonti and Walrus. Even more interesting was when Lord D voted Walrus (at three votes) Slinky was only two minutes later voting jonti at three votes.

Vote Slinky

 

[trespoe]

No he's not.

sez you.

 

[Lord_D]

Vote AVN.

Unvote walrus, Vote CCA for not bolding his vote.

He didn't even let the Walrus blubber get cold before jumping him again.

said the bishop to the actress.

:rofl:

Lord D seems to give me an odd vibe. Maybe it is just his rhino butt. I don't like big butts, I cannot lie. He also voted me at one time. Yet he also broke the tie yesterday against Walrus (the third vote).

There is noothing wrong with my butt!

I broke it because it had to be done. There were 3 (4?) people with 2 votes at the time, and we had to move it up a little. Especially since I also had a vote on me

 

[randakar]

Official Count
10 hours 53 minutes until deadline


AVN (2)- Kaetje[187], CCA[201]
Slinky (2) - AVN[194], trespoe[204]
trespoe (1) - walrus v2[190]
jamie550 (1) - marty99[199]
Lord_D (1) - jonti-h[200]
CCA (1) - Lord_D[184,206]


Not voted (3) - slinky, jamie550, hax

 

[jonti-h]

Unvote LordD vote Jamie550 because TIE!!!

 

[AVN]

Not voted - slinkie

If Slinky's name is written as slinkie I really get the idea he's a baddie.

Are you giving a hint here GM ?

 

[EUROO7]

Kinkie?

 

[randakar]

If Slinky's name is written as slinkie I really get the idea he's a baddie.

Are you giving a hint here GM ?

Kinkie?

Deffeenitelie-a

 

[AVN]

Deffeenitelie-a

Thanks

Then I think it's better we go for CCA, who also didn't explain his votes.

Unvote Slinky Vote CCA

 

[randakar]

Official Count
8 hours 46 minutes until deadline


AVN (2) - Kaetje[187], CCA[201]
CCA (2) - Lord_D[184,206], AVN[194,212]
jamie550 (2) - marty99[199], jonti-h[200,208]
Slinky (1) - trespoe[204]
trespoe (1) - walrus v2[190]


Not voted (3) - slinky, jamie550, hax

 

[Slinky]

For now I will vote Slinky. He changed his vote several times yesterday, without giving any explanation. I hope this will be an incentive for him to talk a little bit more today.

I will talk more today with or without incentive. See I have done it already

I made those votes to hopefully have something to analyse today.

 

[Slinky]

If at this point I have to guess who the wolves are, I would say trespoe, lord_d and jamie550. Their actions yesterday would fit with them being in the same pack.

Vote trespoe

 

[Jamie550]

Hello, everyone.

First, I apologize for not being around yesterday - I was busy yesterday and today until now. If you want evidence, see the FTG link in my Sig, in which thread I have not replied to for around 36 hours, despite the poster being very helpful.

As to the question of whether I am quieter as a wolf - yes, I am. It's a very annoying baddie tell that still persists, despite strenuous efforts to avoid it.

Now, I will confess that my vote of yesterday on Hax was not completely random. My reasoning is not that hard to guess, and no, it doesn't have to do with his claim of being a villager. It has more to do with his being around, if you get my drift.

Vote jonti-h
For the retaliation vote on AVN, and because, AFAIK, so far no one has got more than one vote until now, if that continues we run the risk of a massive TIE

Now, Marty is a great analyzer, and this statement, made nearly a day before deadline, simply does not fit him trying to ping the wolves. It is similar to the tell of avoiding TIEs, but regardless, it's not clear at all why Marty said something like this - for BS justifications, people hardly use justifications that could be misinterpreted as actually being true justifications. And plus, there's nothing wrong with retaliation.

Also, it is very annoying that votes are not bolded and sized.

If at this point I have to guess who the wolves are, I would say trespoe, lord_d and jamie550. Their actions yesterday would fit with them being in the same pack.

Vote trespoe

Yes. A wolfpack from not even two days of posts. No credible analysis of accusations. In fact, no analysis whatsoever of accusations. And it seems like you just tried to pick these names randomly from a list. #2, #7, and #11 - very evenly spread out, which is what someone choosing randomly would fallaciously select. You have no evidence whatsoever, and might as well just be throwing names out to say something. Plus, if you thought us three were the wolves (and if you actually name a pack, you'd better have some amount of evidence), then you should vote me and not Trespoe, as I am more likely to be lynched. But this way, you're better able to switch to your primary opponent, in case you start accumulating votes. Plus, your vote switching yesterday, despite your protestations to the contrary, have done nothing useful, but rather sowed confusion into the village, as well as make it harder to read your own actions.

Vote Slinky

Sli [2] - Jamie [216] Tres [204]
Jamie [2] - Jonti [208] Marty [199]
Cca [2] - Avn [212] LordD [206]
Tres [2] - Sli [215] Wal2 [190]
Avn [2] - Cca [201] Kaet [187]
None [1] - Hax

 

[Lord_D]

Yes. A wolfpack from not even two days of posts. No credible analysis of accusations. In fact, no analysis whatsoever of accusations. And it seems like you just tried to pick these names randomly from a list. #2, #7, and #11 - very evenly spread out, which is what someone choosing randomly would fallaciously select. You have no evidence whatsoever, and might as well just be throwing names out to say something. Plus, if you thought us three were the wolves (and if you actually name a pack, you'd better have some amount of evidence), then you should vote me and not Trespoe, as I am more likely to be lynched. But this way, you're better able to switch to your primary opponent, in case you start accumulating votes. Plus, your vote switching yesterday, despite your protestations to the contrary, have done nothing useful, but rather sowed confusion into the village, as well as make it harder to read your own actions.

Hunt Slinky

ssshht. Stop doing that. You're only confirming us to be the wolves. And you did a crovax

Also, I have often pondered about the merits of doing a lot of vote switching. I have yet to come to any conclusion if it does any good for the analysis. I think it might be able to do some small good, but the problem is people aren't constantly online and thus if a wolf doesn't log in in the time between 2 voteswitches he won't be able to do make an action (possibly giving the village more information on his identity) and any conclusions you draw from this might be flawed. I'm pretty sure it's all way easier to see IRL, when you only have a minute or so to decide^^

 

[randakar]

I like the activity levels. Keep it up.

Also, doing counts gives you lots of muppet points.
What those are useful for exactly beats me, but hey

edit: Wait, is that a 5 way tie? oooh ...

 

[Slinky]

Yes. A wolfpack from not even two days of posts. No credible analysis of accusations. In fact, no analysis whatsoever of accusations. And it seems like you just tried to pick these names randomly from a list. #2, #7, and #11 - very evenly spread out, which is what someone choosing randomly would fallaciously select. You have no evidence whatsoever, and might as well just be throwing names out to say something. Plus, if you thought us three were the wolves (and if you actually name a pack, you'd better have some amount of evidence), then you should vote me and not Trespoe, as I am more likely to be lynched. But this way, you're better able to switch to your primary opponent, in case you start accumulating votes. Plus, your vote switching yesterday, despite your protestations to the contrary, have done nothing useful, but rather sowed confusion into the village, as well as make it harder to read your own actions.

Vote Slinky

It seems like I struck a nerve.

I like some parts of your defence: like how you are accusing me of not voting you. I could easily solve that, but is that really what you want me to do? Saying that I have no basis for that post is seriously insulting me, however you made me laugh with that line about random numbers, so it's all good.

My accusation on trespoe and Lord_D was based on the voting material so far. I unvoted Lord_D and voted trespoe, then Lord_D votes someone else in the lead. He didn't do this when he was still part of the tie, but only after he was clear. Some strange behaviour there, but that could be explained by him not being online before. It's not rock hard evidence. Hence why I am posting "if I have to guess who the wolves are" Working from the assumption that Lord_D and trespoe are wolves, I thought you the most likely packmate. I wasn't convinced of you guys being wolves, but your reaction is changing that.

And you might think my vote switching was useless, but I am finding it quite useful.

Unvote trespoe
Vote Lord_D

The person who I initially thought to be the most likely wolf, but didn't vote because of having no votes yet. Still I am tempted to change to jamie550. I wasn't seriously attacking him with my post but he reacts like I have bitten him or something.

 

[Lord_D]

My accusation on trespoe and Lord_D was based on the voting material so far. I unvoted Lord_D and voted trespoe, then Lord_D votes someone else in the lead. He didn't do this when he was still part of the tie, but only after he was clear.

How could I have changed my vote when I was still part of the tie. I wasn't even online :wacko: (actually, I was shopping in Dutchieland if you're interested )

Some strange behaviour there, but that could be explained by him not being online before.

Well there we have it. I have nothing more to say, you said enough yourself already.