You're missing the crucial point, I did not see Snoops voteI have the same reasons that others proposed first: First, you vote for oy, claiming to want to break the tie; then when someone else votes oy, you quickly change your vote back to jonti, therefore bringing the tie closer again. Doesn't make sense, therefore smells of WOLF.
There is no physical way I could have seen it and reacted to it deliberately that fast, therefore the case against me collapses
And you have subtly rewrote what happened yesterday
I said that I did not want either Walrus or OY lynched given their propensity for dying early
However, soon after, with precious little time to go until the deadline, a TIE was created between those two
Yes, I stil did not want to kill either of them but it looked at the time that at least one of them would have to die I switched to OY to prevent the tie, this was only about 5 minutes before the deadline
A few minutes later, when the chance came to save OrangeYoshi and still prevent a TIE, of course I took it, not wanting to lynch Walrus either, I had only two possible options, jonti or snoop and I chose jonti
So, now that you have yesterdays events summarised completely and are in full possession of the facts, as well as logically sound (from a villager's POV) reasons for my actions, tell me what is wolfish about my actions yesterday, with reference to the whole thing, not just individual things that, taken out of context, would look wolfish