Werewolf Lite CLVII - The village

[EUROO7]

Well first of all, his name is Banana.

and secondly of the all the things was that the fact that it was actually sometime near the thing which was indeed something for the ages.

But your analysis seems good enough, and I'm glad you're not just saying "marty is right".

 

[OrangeYoshi]

Why?

I voted both wolves, and before it was cool.

Better, as they say, than you.

It isn't just that you voted for someone, it is your reason for doing so.

I think the wolves that are left though probably were not in either bandwagon at the beginning or middle (maybe the end) they probably saw the writing on the wall and wrote them off to save themselves so I think anyone that voted for either and especially both wolves are safe...

Joining a bandwagon in the middle is what a wolf would do to gain the most credibility.

 

[jonti-h]

It isn't just that you voted for someone, it is your reason for doing so.

That makes no sense.

 

[OrangeYoshi]

That makes no sense.

You may vote for a wolf, but was it to make yourself look like a better villager, or to get rid of one of the enemy?

 

[XvDravarvX]

Joining a bandwagon in the middle is what a wolf would do to gain the most credibility.

But why would they join against their own packmate? If the issue was in doubt why not jump against the other guy? Sure it looks odd, but the wolves would save their packmate for another day and we wouldn't have 20/20 hindsight. It would be seen as just a wrong guess?

 

[jonti-h]

You may vote for a wolf, but was it to make yourself look like a better villager, or to get rid of one of the enemy?

Go look back at the times I voted for the wolves, my analysis pointing to Teep's guilt, my crucial vote for Hax. They say the worst moment in a debate si when you realise you are wrong, can you tell me how that feels?

 

[Mr. G]

Villager offences bananas!
A disrespectful villager has offended the favourite food of the monkeys. He has received a fine for his unacceptable behaviour.

 

[EUROO7]

But why would they join against their own packmate? If the issue was in doubt why not jump against the other guy? Sure it looks odd, but the wolves would save their packmate for another day and we wouldn't have 20/20 hindsight. It would be seen as just a wrong guess?

You are of course correct. If at all possible, one should always try to save a packmate as this is the best strategy for winning faster.

@Mr. G: NO U

 

[jonti-h]

You are of course correct. If at all possible, one should always try to save a packmate as this is the best strategy for winning faster.

@Mr. G: NO U

Indeed, although under certain circumstances it can be useful to sacrifice a packmate, but generally only the useless ones.

Interestingly PY and his previous incarnation Rysz have cast throwaway votes both days.

 

[EUROO7]

Indeed, although under certain circumstances it can be useful to sacrifice a packmate, but generally only the useless ones.

True, but then you have to do it just right so people don't suspect you of doing it.

As for Rysz/Split, he's getting enought votes, isn't he?

 

[jonti-h]

True, but then you have to do it just right so people don't suspect you of doing it.

As for Rysz/Split, he's getting enought votes, isn't he?

I thought PY was Rysz?

Also this is insulting bananas

 

[EUROO7]

Who's this pie person?

And no, split is rysz

 

[jonti-h]

Who's this pie person?

And no, split is rysz

David Milliband, he is an MP, he posed that pic when it was rumoured he wanted to depose the prime minister.

Also, that is why I hate subs. It is so hard to keep up with them.
Who is PY subbing for?

 

[unmerged(180651)]

PrangeYoshi? Are we all calling him that now?

Or maybe PurpleYoshi? PumpkinYoshi?

 

[jonti-h]

PrangeYoshi? Are we all calling him that now?

Or maybe PurpleYoshi? PumpkinYoshi?

Ask Lemeard, he started it IIRC

 

[Lemeard]

Vote OrangeYoshi

Trying to accuse Jonti, who is a bad suspect, is poor show. Exactly what are you trying to accomplish?

Ask Lemeard, he started it IIRC

Maybe. I don't remember. o

 

[OrangeYoshi]

But why would they join against their own packmate? If the issue was in doubt why not jump against the other guy? Sure it looks odd, but the wolves would save their packmate for another day and we wouldn't have 20/20 hindsight. It would be seen as just a wrong guess?

You never know which way they will go. That is why I said it shouldn't clear them if they did so on a single day.

Go look back at the times I voted for the wolves, my analysis pointing to Teep's guilt, my crucial vote for Hax.

Maybe a crucial vote for Hax, but there was never anything really pointing to the guilt of either Teep or Hax.

They say the worst moment in a debate si when you realise you are wrong, can you tell me how that feels?

I can't be wrong if I never said I was right.

 

[jonti-h]

Vote OrangeYoshi

Trying to accuse Jonti, who is a bad suspect, is poor show. Exactly what are you trying to accomplish?

He clearly lives in a country where strong narcotics are legal. Don't be too hard on him.

 

[jonti-h]

Maybe a crucial vote for Hax, but there was never anything really pointing to the guilt of either Teep or Hax.

Bull.

I cast a vote that put Hax in a lynchable position. I presented a case against Teep for Johan's sake, and voted on him early. Had you looked at the thread you would know this.

Of course as a player who voted Walrus and chucked away a vote on EURO your trying to cast doubt on me is frigging laughable....

I can't be wrong if I never said I was right.

Of course you can be, and are wrong.

 

[OrangeYoshi]

Also, that is why I hate subs. It is so hard to keep up with them.
Who is PY subbing for?

Oky

Trying to accuse Jonti, who is a bad suspect, is poor show. Exactly what are you trying to accomplish?

I'm just trying to start some discussion. I wasn't accusing jonti of anything and if you notice, I still said he was an unlikely wolf.