@ Falc
The distribution of the votes gives credence to what you're saying about wolves adjusting to avoid being trapped by Branigan's Law of Suspects. If there were a lot of votes on Najs (or any other frontrunner) it's more likely there are wolves among them. Firstly, it's a zero-sum game so it's automatically more likely; 8/16 is more likely to contain wolves than 4/16, if you follow my meaning, although it doesn't make them easier to catch. The actual principle beneath the Law, as I see it, is that voting for the frontrunner is a good way of keeping your packmates out of harm's way - can't get lynched if they're a mile behind the frontrunner - and to avoid suspicion because voting for the frontrunner's OK.
In this case votes are scattered almost as evenly as they could be: 4-3-3-3-1/-2 non votes. This suggests the wolves diffused their voting strength to avoid detection. If they were online at the right times yesterday then with the way votes shook out it wouldn't be hard to have done. Quite possibly some just meant to make inconsequential votes that villagers inadvertently made more useful by adding to.
Now while I picked from Najs' killers, I don't actually disapprove of looking elsewhere. I very nearly voted Najs myself, and had I been online at deadline I'd have shifted onto him to lock it down. The only people I'd take off the hook are those who ran yesterday, for the simple reason of avoiding the damn village wrecking cycle of pursuing the same guys over and over. So not me, Randy, or Seen. So that only leaves, oh, eleven candidates...
Granted I have concluded, like others, that Seen or Randy being wolves is low odds play. The wolves would have had every reason to consolidate, not scatter, if there was a wolf among the group. This does hint (building guesses on guesses) that none of Najs' killers are wolves; if I were a wolf, online at deadline, and saw the ability to take four villagers with me, I'd do it. It would go from 12/4 to 7/4 the next day with the hunt. After the life was wagoned out of me we'd go to 5/3 -Parity Day on Day 3 with 0 days of information for the village? All it takes is one villager to guess wrong, with no information to go on unless the seer's had some luck, and the wolves win. But it's possible the wolves aren't gamblers, or weren't online.
Anyway, as for solid observations, we've got the diffused vote suggesting no wolves among the Day 1 candidates. That leaves 11 players. Making another stab here, I think Enkhuush being hunted might actually slightly exonerate the remaining players who voted for Najs - why narrow down the suspects list if your packmates are on it? Wolves have made this mistake many times, I know, but it makes more sense to me if they wanted to avoid clarifying anything about the Day 1 candidates by hunting any of them, and picked someone from the most likely victim's voters in order to avoid revealing anything about the composition of the other voters.
On this basis I'm going to move off of my first target and:
Unvote Falc
Vote Yakman
Multiplies my vote because he's already got one on him, and he's interesting, helping add a fourth candidate late in the day.
