Can we have a votecount please? I am interested in knowing why Bagricula switched his vote...
And Snoop, dead wolves tell no tales.
And Snoop, dead wolves tell no tales.
Can we have a votecount please? I am interested in knowing why Bagricula switched his vote...
Oh my.
vote Bagricula
He engineered that tie, right?
Ah, my mistake then. Should have pushed snoop forward. I thought I was in a 3-way tie with Falc and snoop.
C'est la vie. I am resigned to being lynch today. Got a trans-Pacific flight on Friday.
Secondly, Reis was also about after this tie was made, asked for a votecount, but failed to do anything to rectify this situation.
Coherence maybe? If I had done anything, you would point out what I previously said and accuse me of incoherence. I must recognize that I missed the deadline, though, got caught up watching TV. Feel free to check if I was posting, although it won't help you.
Now, Bagricula, well, he was in the running so he had the self-preservation excuse. I must give this some thought, before committing my heavier-than-usual vote.
@ Boris : Read what I said on day 1. If you still want to lynch me then, go ahead and try.
How was I supposed to know it would be disastrous? AFAIK there could be wolves in there. Why would I save them?
Not that having one more villager die fits my definition of disastrous, by the way...
On that basis we might as well arrange everyone to vote for themselves on Day 1 in a megatie. There are sure to be wolves in them - why save them?
From here on out we cannot use a tie productively: if we get it wrong, parity comes closer. If we get 1 wolf, we reach parity on the same day anyway. I consider that fairly disastrous, because we have 4 days and the ability to use 1 tie to even the odds. Now we've got 4 days and no tie. Disastrous might be the wrong word, but stupid, pointless, unhelpful, and damaging are suitable adjectives. I suppose if it exposes a wolf, it's helpful, but if it was just village stupidity, we're in serious trouble.