I agree with doom, but am not sure about Marty. There were several players near lynching velocity, and I am sure at least one was a wolf. Which would mean Adams or falc could be furry, too.
unvote falc
Vote doombunny
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I agree with doom, but am not sure about Marty. There were several players near lynching velocity, and I am sure at least one was a wolf. Which would mean Adams or falc could be furry, too.
unvote falc
Vote doombunny
Also obviously Marty99 will vote to save himself, so by voting Doombunny, Falc who is online right now, is breaking a tie... just FYI
There's no need to be offensive, even if you are in fact a misled villager. Generally, if you call for someone to be lynched, you're required to have some decent evidence against them.
You have posted two, very poor reasons against me.
#1: "Doom was saved on the first day by Marty"
Read the thread again. There was a 2-way tie set up on the first day. I specifically said I would not push for anyone to be lynched, and that I would only act if it was necessary to break the tie. This was with over an hour left, there was plenty of time for the voting to go any way, and I did not attempt to influence it. Shortly afterwards, Comm Cody then made it a 3-way tie. Nothing else happened, then the deadline came, and no-one else was there, I kept my promise, and prevented a three-way tie.
Now you tell me, if you were in my position, as a villager, would you have kept the 3-way tie, or would you have broken it and minimised the carnage like I did? I'll let it be noted that no-one objected to me breaking the tie, even though I suggested it well in advance
I find it curious you do not mention EUROO7 here as well. My switch also saved him, yet you make no mention of him.
Who do you not mention EURO? This isn't the only time you've ignored certain things either, as I'll show shortly.
Reason #2 "I believe Marty was saved yesterday"
Depends what you mean by saved. You seem to be implying there was some concerted, last-ditch effort to get me out of the lead
However, a quick inspection of the facts will show that the last vote on me occurred over 20 hours before the deadline. You will also note that none a single one of the votes had a coherent argument. Afterwards, the village saw sense and gradually voted for other candidates. There was little actual danger of me being lynched anywhere near the deadline, so your claim that I was mysteriously saved doesn't really add up. I just happened to not be the best candidate over a 24 hour period.
Depends what you mean by saved. You seem to be implying there was some concerted, last-ditch effort to get me out of the lead
However, a quick inspection of the facts will show that the last vote on me occurred over 20 hours before the deadline. You will also note that none a single one of the votes had a coherent argument. Afterwards, the village saw sense and gradually voted for other candidates. There was little actual danger of me being lynched anywhere near the deadline, so your claim that I was mysteriously saved doesn't really add up. I just happened to not be the best candidate over a 24 hour period.
Can't lynch all waffles in one go mate. First we lynch you and doom and then look for less obvious waffles....
So instead of responding to the actual content of my post, you come back with a circular argument, starting with the premise that I'm a waffle.
I take this mean you do not in fact have a decent case against me?
I call shenanigans on that one, I'm afraid. Who's agreeing here?
Since you posted your argument, absolutely no one has backed it up and several have cast aspersions on it. Why are you pretending everyone is in agreement, when clearly they are not?
you are a waffle.... you broke a tie to protect either doom or euro on day 1. and then your packmates broke a run up on you on day 2. The fact that there was 20 hours between that and deadline is irrelevant, since you correctly pointed out that this village is inactive.So instead of responding to the actual content of my post, you come back with a circular argument, starting with the premise that I'm a waffle.
I take this mean you do not in fact have a decent case against me?
You know, I really don't want to lynch Doombunny here. I said on the first day he was a bad lynch and I'll say it again. They way he made such a casual remark about hunting THE_SPLIT, and then the village jumping on him for an alleged crovax, that really suggested to me he's not a likely wolf.
But if the alternative is my own ass, then I have no choice. If anyone else wants to try propose another candidate, feel free, but THE_SPLIT might not allow you
Vote Doombunny
But if the alternative is my own ass, then I have no choice. If anyone else wants to try propose another candidate, feel free, but THE_SPLIT might not allow you
Vote Doombunny
You still haven't responded to my post. You simply regurgitated your original argument.
I'll ask you a simple question: Is anyone who breaks a 3-way tie automatically a wolf?
That seems to be what you're suggesting here.
And the fact that there was a 20 hour game is most certainly relevant. If I had been in front with 10 minutes to go, then I would've been in danger. With an entire day left? Dude, anything can happen in 20 hours. And since you're so certain my 'packmates broke a run up', who exactly are these packmates?
Damn right, I wont allow it. Either Marty or Doom has to be a waffle.... We need to lynch both of them today!