We still have two hours, relax.da hell you are doing?
EDIT: Crap, I didn't see Jonti vote back, I was too busy changing my vote.
We still have two hours, relax.da hell you are doing?
That's fine. Good, even. What I meant was it didn't make my vote on madchemist irrelevant or a bandwagon, so it remained a viable vote to make.Actually, I'm fairly sure your vote put Madchemist up by one.
It's ok, if this keeps up until deadline I'm sure Euro will scream when he starts counting votes.
Unvote Aedan the seer. Vote Madchemist the villager.
He seems to have been more quieter than his usual.
Unvote Aedan777 Vote Madchemist
Really, really didn't want to vote the same way as snoop again, but reading back I do get a bit of an off feeling about madchemist and I can't really put if off any longer. K-59 did too. I hope this at least stirs him into action because he is online.
EDIT: Holy shit, three votes happen in about 30 seconds before I posted. But they don't seem to have changed the situation too much.
Fixed. And I have been counting all day, but every time I think there needs a count you have just posted one. Or like this time I post one just after you.Ah good, another vote counter. Once Wagonlitz fixes the latest vote in I can go do the laundry and something to eat.
Is it, now.All right, all right, I'm here. I haven't quite been up to my usual standard of witty banter and chaotic vote switching, I'll give you that. But I'm reasonably content with my chosen candidate, especially since he is still a frontrunner, and I don't really buy whatever the argument against aedan was, so I've been content to sit back and watch. If you think I'm a wolf, your detecting ability is off today.
So pjnlsn is now just as bad as ********* and ******?Applaudable decision. If you really feeling lonely, I would suggest, that the one who is not to be named will be more than happy to converse with you, via private correspondence..
I read it in the same way; I am not sure it is a crovax though, since it could just as well be that it was a terrible way for the village to win by first lynching villagers instead of wolves and the wolves just in time to avoid parity. At least that was how I interpreted it.I read that as "This is a terrible way to win [voting aedan777 without giving reason] - but it will result in win". Could be total misreading but I'd have expected something like "this is totally stupid way to play for villager" or something to that effect, now it read villagers will gain by voting you, albeit with stupid (as in, no) reason.
I read it in the same way; I am not sure it is a crovax though, since it could just as well be that it was a terrible way for the village to win by first lynching villagers instead of wolves and the wolves just in time to avoid parity. At least that was how I interpreted it.
I interpreted it as 'Madchemist is a wolf and anyone who says otherwise is a commie'. Off the record, I agree with it.
Oh. I interpreted it as "lynching villagers is a terrible tactic for a village that wants to win". It seemed pretty innocuous to me.