Yep, first game is the Paradox star league, this was my second. I guess someone had a problem with me voting for Capt. Kiwi without reason lol
Care to sub?
Yep, first game is the Paradox star league, this was my second. I guess someone had a problem with me voting for Capt. Kiwi without reason lol
Interestingly, reis voted for Athalcor the moment he voted Xeno. You'll notice the post was edited. I happened to see it before the edit, and the "reasoned" reason for going for Athalcor wasn't nearly as well developed, and it's still not water tight. That edited reason managed to shift the focus off Xeno for a while. I'll also note in passing that Randakar completely ignored the Athalcor vote for Xeno. It was a random vote with little to say, but he did find something to say about everything else...
WW is not Soviet. WW comes from the dawn of times, from the formation of tribes, guided by a Seer, and beset by angry beasts who forced the humans to unite and exterminate them. Like I am about to do...
unvote Rysz
vote Athalcor
PS : Have I told you how I dislike blatantly random votes? Sure, we don't have much to go on, but there was already one hunt, there is something to think already. Who might have had SPLIT hunted? You were pestered by him in the last Lite, but... it was public, and thus you might have been wary of being accused of meta. Others could have used exactly the same ploy to frame you. Or you could have done it yourself and banked on the old "I would never do something as obvious as that"...
Need more data. And brave wolves that are not cowards to meet my challenge face to face, instead of having me hunted so I don't blow them up.
First of all: I applaud Capt. Kiwi for the enthusiasm and thinking he puts into this game. If all new players were like that, we old veterans are quickly outplayed.
I will have to think further about whether his conclusion is valid or not.
You mean this one, right? I edited in the explanation, because I meant to write a line and ended up writing a lot.
First of all: I applaud Capt. Kiwi for the enthusiasm and thinking he puts into this game. If all new players were like that, we old veterans are quickly outplayed.
I will have to think further about whether his conclusion is valid or not.
Randakar is certainly cunning enough to pull off grand schemes, but he is not one to include a sellout in that scheme. That is not to say he would never do a sellout, but certainly not a planned one.
I hate it when not the suspicious acting person gets votes, but the one who set the suspicious action off. If you think the wolves put a quick wagon of votes (not that a good wolf pack would do that anyway) on someone else to save a suspected packmate. Then vote bandwagonning wolves, and not the perhaps (in this case, assured) innocent that is only passively a part of it.
Also, by announcing it, do you really think wolves would again (especially since the first time was already unlikely enough) do such a thing?
Rysz, I recall a certain game where I had all of my pack voting me for 3 or 4 days. Randakar was in that pack. Never say never.
Caught up with the rest. I agree with most of the analysis, and do not deny I have done some suspicious things, but questioning the lynch of a packmate when he is about to be lynched is a huge gamble.
Yet, you failed to ask yourself a really important question. Was there more than one wolf being run-up yesterday? It can seriously affect projections. Even randakar might have sold one packmate out to prevent a possible jacob-lite TIEwith 2 wolves.
And what about the hunt. It seriously puzzles me. Kingepyon? Was it an attempt at searching the Seer in the throwaways? Was it because he voted another wolf, and they thought he had scanned him on the first night but didn't have a mean to out him safely? (a bit convoluted for sure, but still within the realm of possibility). Sure, Seers, especially those less experienced, tend to avoid engagements in lynches and generally play a more conservative game.
Isn't seer usually only given to players who have shown enough of a track record to be considered reliable? Although there are quite a few newer players. But I agree, the only reasons for hunting Kingepyon that I can see are because he was though to be a very serious threat, or to make it look like he was. And all he posted that I saw was a vote on me.
randakar is the one who has pushed that line the most, although quite subtly. I was hoping he would bring up that theory, and he sought of did, but Kingepyon was unfortunately the one to actually put it in words first.
I applaud the tinfoil hat Captain Kiwi put on, but it's pretty much wrong on my part.
Where did I say Athalcor was a good target? He was better than a pure random vote, sure, but .. not by much, really.
And really, why did I vote Xeno in the first place then, when at that time there were several others at two votes on them? If I was Xeno's packmate that would have put him into danger unnecessarily, wouldn't it? I could have just left it alone, or switch to some villager instead.
*shrug* Then again, I like being a little suspicious here. It suits me just fine.
What we really should do though is take a look at people voting Najs and (to a lesser degree) Athalcor in this run up. Najs is about as cleared as it gets, so he would be a valid target for wolves to vote without selling out packmates.
Isn't seer usually only given to players who have shown enough of a track record to be considered reliable? Although there are quite a few newer players. But I agree, the only reasons for hunting Kingepyon that I can see are because he was though to be a very serious threat, or to make it look like he was. And all he posted that I saw was a vote on me.
randakar is the one who has pushed that line the most, although quite subtly. I was hoping he would bring up that theory, and he sought of did, but Kingepyon was unfortunately the one to actually put it in words first.
Also, what did Kingepyon do to deserve a day one hunt? Care to explain, wolves?
I'm not really out to get Kingepyon or tamius or Falc lynched first up. That can wait till next time.
Right, I can't make sense of this now. Perhaps later, with a fresh mind.
Placeholder : vote Boris
Edit : Yes, 1/12 odds with a dice roll, after sorting the wolves. But after the game begins, behavioral analysis starts being applied. Epyon staying out of the struggle and generally not drawing attention to himself could have been taken as a sign of a somewhat inexperienced seer.