-
Crusader Kings III Available Now!
The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
This thread is more than 5 months old.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose. If you feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though.
Day 1/Night 1
Korona the villager is hunted
Cite as: 574 U. S. ____ (2014) 1
Per Curiam
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PATRICK GLEBE, SUPERINTENDENT, STAFFORD
CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER v.
JOSHUA JAMES FROST
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 14–95 Decided November 17, 2014
PER CURIAM.
Over 11 days in April 2003, respondent Joshua Frost
helped two associates commit a series of armed robberies
in the State of Washington. In the main, Frost drove his
confederates to and from their crimes. On one occasion, he
also entered the house being robbed. On another, he
performed surveillance in anticipation of the robbery.
Washington charged Frost with robbery and related
offenses. Taking the witness stand, Frost admitted to his
involvement, but claimed he acted under duress. As clos-
ingarguments drew near, however, Frost’s lawyer ex-
pressedthe desire to contend both (1) that the State failed
to meet its burden of proving that Frost was an accomplice
to the crimes and (2) that Frost acted under duress. The
trial judge insisted that the defense choose between these
alternative arguments, explaining that state law prohi-
biteda defendant from simultaneously contesting the ele-
mentsof the crime and presenting the affirmative defense
of duress. So Frost’s lawyer limited his summation to
duress. The jury convicted Frost of six counts of robbery,
one count of attempted robbery, one count of burglary, and
two counts of assault.
The Washington Supreme Court sustained Frost’s con-
viction.It rejected the trial court’s view that state law
prohibited Frost from simultaneously contesting criminal
liability and arguing duress. State v. Frost, 160 Wash. 2d
765, 773–776, 161 P. 3d 361, 366–368 (2007) (en banc).
Alxeu the villager is lynchedPer Curiam
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PATRICK GLEBE, SUPERINTENDENT, STAFFORD
CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER v.
JOSHUA JAMES FROST
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 14–95 Decided November 17, 2014
PER CURIAM.
Over 11 days in April 2003, respondent Joshua Frost
helped two associates commit a series of armed robberies
in the State of Washington. In the main, Frost drove his
confederates to and from their crimes. On one occasion, he
also entered the house being robbed. On another, he
performed surveillance in anticipation of the robbery.
Washington charged Frost with robbery and related
offenses. Taking the witness stand, Frost admitted to his
involvement, but claimed he acted under duress. As clos-
ingarguments drew near, however, Frost’s lawyer ex-
pressedthe desire to contend both (1) that the State failed
to meet its burden of proving that Frost was an accomplice
to the crimes and (2) that Frost acted under duress. The
trial judge insisted that the defense choose between these
alternative arguments, explaining that state law prohi-
biteda defendant from simultaneously contesting the ele-
mentsof the crime and presenting the affirmative defense
of duress. So Frost’s lawyer limited his summation to
duress. The jury convicted Frost of six counts of robbery,
one count of attempted robbery, one count of burglary, and
two counts of assault.
The Washington Supreme Court sustained Frost’s con-
viction.It rejected the trial court’s view that state law
prohibited Frost from simultaneously contesting criminal
liability and arguing duress. State v. Frost, 160 Wash. 2d
765, 773–776, 161 P. 3d 361, 366–368 (2007) (en banc).
Korona the villager is hunted
You didn't want your packmate Arkasas lynched, then you thought I outed him. Now face the consequences!
When did I say I didn't want Arky lynched? I said I wanted Alxeu lynched for being a zombie; something I also said in IRC which Dadarian can confirm.
Thanks! That was the intention. I've been borrowing heavily from Ironhead's performance in the last Lite.
STOP! COOKIE TIME