For the idiots/noobs among us, Rovsea is voting to kill someone he believes to be a villager, according to his last post.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Still, I know that I am a villager, but I am not as sure about Brovahkiin (in fact, I sort of doubt that he is a villager), so I don't see how a TIE will help us.
First: Stop misusing the French language, it's too soon.
Second: You said you don't like ties that kill villagers. Read my last post.
Contradicting yourself already. Rovsea when will you learn how to play as a wolf?
Not true. A TIE would unnecessarily kill me, and I am a villager. Explain how this is not true? Besides, when I disparaged TIEs, I was not talking about this TIE in particular, it was a generalized statement. I think that TIEs are overrated, because they have the chance to do nothing but kill extra villagers. if this still is not clear to you, then god help you.
See, that might be funny to somebody, if I was a wolf. Let me go through this one more time.
You said
In my respone to this quote, I mentioned that I do not like ties in which nothing but villagers die. That does NOT mean that I was specifically mentioning this TIE here, in this game, as evidenced by the fact that I referenced the TIEs we've had in the Big.
We don't know that. Stop this idiotic line of reasoning.
TIEs are about eliminating suspects, but you're clearly not out of your noobish hatred of ties phase yet. I'll give you time.
While you do that, explain why you think you should not die based on what you've said.
so what is your problem with this tie? If you think Brovo is a wolf, and you can't come up with a credible defense that goes beyond "I know I'm a villager", what is the problem with this tie?
I am getting frustrated by your response. I do not hate TIEs. I acknowledge that they can be useful at times. That does not make them necessary, as some people seem to think. I have said nothing that can be construed as incriminating, but this is only by my own context. I acknowledge that from your perspective this might not be the case, but i still feel like the case on Brovahkiin is stronger. I cannot make your vote for you. Consider what I have said, and then make your own decision.
Unvote marty the 99th
Vote Rovsea of Bhutan
I've seen enough wolf play from Rovsea lately to see through this ploy. He loves playing the "Confused Villager" card whenever he has fur.
Vote Rovsea of Bhutan
I've seen enough wolf play from Rovsea lately to see through this ploy. He loves playing the "Confused Villager" card whenever he has fur.
You're sadly mistaken about that last bit. If you only knew the power of the villager.
Guys, there wasn't even tie. Bro has been in lead by at least one vote for some hours now.
EDIT: Now I believe there is tie.
EDIT: Now I believe there is tie.
Wow. I almost got very mad at this. Please explain precisely how I am using the "confused villager" card, and I will tell you how this is not true.
People always say this and it is an incredibly pointless statement to make, even by werewolf standards. It can mean literally anything from you merely thinking he isn't 100% a wolf (which is obvious) to you thinking there is a greater than 50% chance he is a wolf (in which case you MUST vote him) and anything and everything in between.
So clarify, what do you think about brovakhiin? No politicians' answers.