This is a very good point.I'm not getting good vibes from you either. You've contributed nothing useful and seem way too willing to follow anyone who makes a point, as since he update you've agreed with 3 different people
This is a very good point.I'm not getting good vibes from you either. You've contributed nothing useful and seem way too willing to follow anyone who makes a point, as since he update you've agreed with 3 different people
Asking someone else to do analysis for you is like asking someone to chew your food for you. Gross unless you are a bird.
Ok, so that metaphor could use some work.
At the moment Luftwafer definitely is looking suspicious to me, but I'll go back and look at all of the thread before I vote today. I feel like we need some more comprehensive analysis. If anybody feels up to doing a colored Vote history, I would really appreciate that as well. It's a great tool for analyzing vote patterns.
If you go back and look at some other games, especially games with Gen. Skobelev in them, you'll see that at the beginning of each new day he posts the votes records of each previous day, vote switches included, and color coded to show the roles of dead players (red for wolves, green for villagers, cyan for seer, much as is shown in updates). By containing all of this information in one place, it is much easier to see how people have voted, what, if any, inconsistencies there are in player actions, that sort of thing. Used in concert with a close analysis of teh thread, wherein one can also consider context and behavior of players and their different moves, I find it a very helpful tool for finding wolves, or at least knowing where to apply pressure.Nah, the metaphor is quite good, could use some fine tuning but the main point is well spent. I'll do it myself, I just thought that it would better if somebody not known as randomly flailing around would do it.
Okay, so what do we have here. We lost the seer which is not amazing but we could still pull this out of the hat. What seems pretty off to me is the bickering from Jackson and Deathnote with a little bit of Luft thrown in there for good measure. It makes a newbie curry so effective that for a moment I wanted to throw myself into it before realising that I would completely ruin the dish with stories that fall flat on their face. I would consider that a Caesarlike event may have caused them to self destruct and get into a big argument on screen though they could've done it in PM's so that feels either foolish and not wolfish or foolish and wolfish. Either way I don't have much to go on. Did the seer come forth with anything to anyone. We might also have to consider those replaced as though they didn't vote the pack still hunted.
I think we should consider the newbie curry, the voters on Wagonlitz who seem a bit off or those who didn't vote, I don't have much to go on but this is what I have gathered.
Point of order, I don't mean anything mean about the newbie curry and would consider myself very green to Forum Werewolf but somewhat decent at normal Werewolf/Mafia. I do consider myself a newbie though.
Could you tell me what that means and I'll gladly do it.
Yes. We have 12 players remaining, assuming worst case scenario (3 villager deaths, although I guess a ridiculous 3 way tie between villagers and a loss is worst case scenario, whatever) we go down to 9 players, 4 wolves, five villagers, so if we want a TIE, today is the last day to do it without a potential loss (unless we manage to catch a wolf).@Rovsea is it tie day?
If you go back and look at some other games, especially games with Gen. Skobelev in them, you'll see that at the beginning of each new day he posts the votes records of each previous day, vote switches included, and color coded to show the roles of dead players (red for wolves, green for villagers, cyan for seer, much as is shown in updates). By containing all of this information in one place, it is much easier to see how people have voted, what, if any, inconsistencies there are in player actions, that sort of thing. Used in concert with a close analysis of teh thread, wherein one can also consider context and behavior of players and their different moves, I find it a very helpful tool for finding wolves, or at least knowing where to apply pressure.
.Wow, I just realized how many new players there are in this game. Namely, Caesar, Jackson, DNC, Luft, Health, Spockyt, and Jerman.
More concerning, none of them have died yet.![]()
Not to mention a noob GM..Wow, I just realized how many new players there are in this game. Namely, Caesar, Jackson, DNC, Luft, Health, Spockyt, and Jerman.
More concerning, none of them have died yet.![]()
Upon further thought, we should probably focus our attention on newer players. We have a lot of new players left (in fact, the majority) which automatically makes it more likely that somewhere in there a wolf lurks, and I've already seen some odd things in the thread.We have all bled for the glory of our god, many have sadly bled more.
Did you indent this?Not to mention a noob GM.
Yes, and I'm not sure how.
There's a button for it.
See?
Wrong. It has been defined that it is a bandwagon if somebody gets 3 votes up. E.g. @madchemist can support me in that.
I'm not sure it's something you can define that simply. I know it when I see it, however.You summoned me for this?
I don't recall that we ever formally defined it, but a 3 vote lead without some sort of outing seems like a not unreasonable definition for it.