Allrighty then. So, another pretty quiet day with quite spread voting. IN the end Audren avoided lynch by his own vote. Only attempt at new candidate appeared when Arkasas switched to 1-vote candidate enkhuush but that didn't go anywhere.
You are already voting k-59. It's possible Audren is a wolf but then I'd expect some of his packmates to consider swooping in and making noise to help him. He had his own vote to rely on, sure, but Lemeard could have taken him with him but didn't. I'd think packmate would have at least thought helping him out. And anyways, it's very fair point what Audren says here:
Also, Audren was run up yesterday. There's still lots of people who are making throwaway votes without getting any votes.
Hmm. Mind telling why I should specifically make a case against you?
Huh. Let me put it this way. "Giving a hint" would be breaking the ghost rules and Lemeard wouldn't do that. Also, I think it's safe to assume he's pissed off when stupid people lynched him for stupid reasons. I mean really, look at the "case" Lemeard was run up and then think if that was lynchworthy case.
And that being said - what's with trying to get me run up for third consecutive day? Is there any reason for it except your odd expectation that I'd make a case against you and wish to strike first?
Or it means the vote has been way too spread and we have had too many throwaway votes/missed votes. We need less spread out voting and more reason behind every vote.
But yeah, now that you mention it, let's have a look at you.
day 1: throwaway on Luftwafer, no switch. Ok, day 1, no big deal.
day 2: quick to drive Lemeard up in the voting. Ok, so Lemeard turns up villager which means it wasn't very good vote.
Still, with having no wolves so far it's hard to say if that was just "normal clueless villager vote" or was it meant to drive at least one villager up quickly instead of having packmate up there. Could go either way at this juncture. Hardly the most damning evidence one way or another.
Eh... madchemist ain't playing. No idea about what Lemeard was voting, though.
Now, I wouldn't mind if we ran up some of those who have not been run up earlier and also preferably somebody who has been going for throwaway votes/not voting. There's not much, if anything, to read from such behaviour. Also, this is penultimate day so we might want to consider tie.
Jacksonian Missionary has missed one vote (though no fault of the current player) and was on Lemeard on day 2. That's about as bad a voting record as anybody has at this stage, missing one vote and then lynching villager (I was about to write innocent villager but we know Lemeard ain't very innocent).
Similarly Wagonlitz was on enkhuush on day 1 and missed vote next day. No info there, really, as we don't know enkhuush's role.
k-59 voted Wagon on day 1 and then quite the throwaway on Luftwafer with less than stellar reason.
So yeah, those three are top of the "we have no info on them" list, I think.
vote Jacksonian Missionary
You are already voting k-59. It's possible Audren is a wolf but then I'd expect some of his packmates to consider swooping in and making noise to help him. He had his own vote to rely on, sure, but Lemeard could have taken him with him but didn't. I'd think packmate would have at least thought helping him out. And anyways, it's very fair point what Audren says here:
Also, Audren was run up yesterday. There's still lots of people who are making throwaway votes without getting any votes.
Hmm. Mind telling why I should specifically make a case against you?
Huh. Let me put it this way. "Giving a hint" would be breaking the ghost rules and Lemeard wouldn't do that. Also, I think it's safe to assume he's pissed off when stupid people lynched him for stupid reasons. I mean really, look at the "case" Lemeard was run up and then think if that was lynchworthy case.
And that being said - what's with trying to get me run up for third consecutive day? Is there any reason for it except your odd expectation that I'd make a case against you and wish to strike first?
Or it means the vote has been way too spread and we have had too many throwaway votes/missed votes. We need less spread out voting and more reason behind every vote.
But yeah, now that you mention it, let's have a look at you.
day 1: throwaway on Luftwafer, no switch. Ok, day 1, no big deal.
day 2: quick to drive Lemeard up in the voting. Ok, so Lemeard turns up villager which means it wasn't very good vote.
Still, with having no wolves so far it's hard to say if that was just "normal clueless villager vote" or was it meant to drive at least one villager up quickly instead of having packmate up there. Could go either way at this juncture. Hardly the most damning evidence one way or another.
Eh... madchemist ain't playing. No idea about what Lemeard was voting, though.
Now, I wouldn't mind if we ran up some of those who have not been run up earlier and also preferably somebody who has been going for throwaway votes/not voting. There's not much, if anything, to read from such behaviour. Also, this is penultimate day so we might want to consider tie.
Jacksonian Missionary has missed one vote (though no fault of the current player) and was on Lemeard on day 2. That's about as bad a voting record as anybody has at this stage, missing one vote and then lynching villager (I was about to write innocent villager but we know Lemeard ain't very innocent).
Similarly Wagonlitz was on enkhuush on day 1 and missed vote next day. No info there, really, as we don't know enkhuush's role.
k-59 voted Wagon on day 1 and then quite the throwaway on Luftwafer with less than stellar reason.
So yeah, those three are top of the "we have no info on them" list, I think.
vote Jacksonian Missionary
