Not necessarily. In the 65 player game, in the early days, I wouldn't call putting somebody 3 ahead a "bandwagon", and the same goes for pretty much any game starting with a lot of players. Still useful to use for lites, though.A bandwagon is defined as putting somebody into a lead of 3 votes; if you make the lead larger still it is a bandwagon too.
Though there can be exceptions of course.
Meh. No movement anywhere. I don't know if CaesarCzech is wolf or not, at least there's been some voices raised against lynching him. I guess it might be because he's hairy or just for the same reason I'll revote now: I don't want him to die quickly in every single game. So,
unvote Rovsea, vote Luftwafer
That is not a self preservation vote.Unvote tonka
vote enkhuush
Self preservation.
Actually it is. Cæsar appears to be unlikely to lynch. If I vote Luft it is likely it will be a race between him and me and I will already have my vote on the other front runner. By putting Enk at the same amount of votes as Luft and I I make it more possible that I won't get further run up.That is not a self preservation vote.
40+ player games are really rare.Not necessarily. In the 65 player game, in the early days, I wouldn't call putting somebody 3 ahead a "bandwagon", and the same goes for pretty much any game starting with a lot of players. Still useful to use for lites, though.
It is a waste. Yes.So cc and luft are at 4 votes now, correct? I assume a tie this early is bad?
That's BS. Caesar hasn't moved at all, and I don't see that changing until just before deadline. Luft has picked up some votes, but CC would be even farther ahead had you voted him. If I could vote you again, I would.Actually it is. Cæsar appears to be unlikely to lynch. If I vote Luft it is likely it will be a race between him and me and I will already have my vote on the other front runner. By putting Enk at the same amount of votes as Luft and I I make it more possible that I won't get further run up.
Rovs you ought to be experienced enough to see such things.
There have been people talking about not wanting to lynch Cæsar due to him often lynching early. Which means he is less likely to lynch---plus I agree with him being a bad lynch due to dying early often.That's BS. Caesar hasn't moved at all, and I don't see that changing until just before deadline. Luft has picked up some votes, but CC would be even farther ahead had you voted him. If I could vote you again, I would.
Wait, do we have a three way TIE? f so, then yes, I can see why that might be a self preservation vote.There have been people talking about not wanting to lynch Cæsar due to him often lynching early. Which means he is less likely to lynch---plus I agree with him being a bad lynch due to dying early often.
And had I voted Cæsar there might well have come a reaction and more votes on me.
Plus by voting enkhuush I make it less likely I will end up in front at the end of the day and I still have the possibility of switching my vote later if needed to save myself.
You seriously don't see how this is superior to just voting the front runner while having your head under your arm? This gives me a larger chance of survival.
Almost. Before I voted Cæsar had 4 votes, Luft and I 3, and Enk 2. After my switch Cæsar had 4, and Luft, Enk and I had 3.Wait, do we have a three way TIE? f so, then yes, I can see why that might be a self preservation vote.