Werewolf Lite CCCXCIII: The Ten-Day' and Croatian Wars [PART 1]

[EUROO7]

Unvote Rovsea
Vote Claude

Sorry Claude, your death will give me vital information on madchemist.

 

[Claude LC]

Assuming I been keeping track of the votes correctly since the last vote count, we still got a tie going on. One way or another we want to break this tie, because it almost certain that both are not baddies. The odds of two wolves in a lite game being running up day 1 are so small, it just able never happens.

Personally, I would like to see a swing onto a new third party.

I know there is some interest in making that third person Audren, so...

Unvote randakar, Vote Audren

OMG E_L ROVSEA CLAUDE PACK CONFIRMED!

 

[madchemist]

This reeks of a madchemist ploy to defend Claude.

If there is a Claude/MC connection, we're now all aware of it's potential existence.

Interesting logic piggybcaking there.

The full trajectory of Emcee's posts with regard to the Claude affair reveals ulterior motives. First he votes him (if they are packmates, an alibi vote [though this is beneath madchemist] would fit). Then, he questions Rovsea's motives in unvoting Claude (giving off the impression of being a strong prosecutor of the noob, a more contrived form of the alibi vote). Then he unvotes him in the face of the wimpiest defense. This last element both gives me the biggest reason to vote madchemist, and the biggest reason to not vote madchemist.

On the one hand, this gives madchemist and claude surface-level antagony that might later be used as a defense for either one if one is lynched and found a wolf. On the other hand, this ploy is so transparent that I don't think madchemist would use it, unless he knew we'd see it as transparent and would not expect him to use it.

and now i've caught myself in a logic loop. fug

I love that my wolf play is somehow respected enough that I could use several levels of reverse psychology in this matter.

 

[Spockyt]

There you go.
Her name is Kira, she is 4 months old.

Unvote Ramius.
Vote Claude.

 

[Eternaly_Lost]

I see no particular reason not to kill one of Claude or Rovsea, preference towards Claude. The potential link between them intrigues me more than voting somebody else.

Yes, but that link does not have to be wolfs, it could be seer and his night 0 scan. If it is a wolf, let the seer confirm it.

 

[Claude LC]

Ok, mental note.
Play quiet as per usual because everytime you try to play a little more acttive you end up as a dead villager.

 

[aedan777]

I could go for the easy save and vote for Claude, but he has been up all day, and hasn't done a bad job of defending, for day 1 standards at least. Despite owning a dog.

Unvote Ramius.
Vote Claude.

Do you have some kind of problem with dogs?

 

[Rovsea]

I see no particular reason not to kill one of Claude or Rovsea, preference towards Claude. The potential link between them intrigues me more than voting somebody else.

Two people being active in the thread at the same time, and consequently responding to each other, does not a conspicuous link make. Did I vote Claude with Day 1 level reasons while I was catching up to the thread? Yes. Did I change that later when I had caught up and found Claude a less appealing candidate? Yes. Please stop over-analyzing.

 

[EUROO7]

I would give my horse for an Arkansas/Claude TIE right now.

 

[Claude LC]

Unvote Ramius.
Vote Claude.

You voted me in the post of my dog.
You are mean.

Do you have some kind of problem with dogs?

I KNOW!

 

[Claude LC]

I would give my horse for an Arkansas/Claude TIE right now.

At least I can help you with that.

Unvote rammius

Vote ark

 

[Audren]

Unvote Ramius.
Vote Claude.

Voting the man for his cute dog? You are either an Austrian or just downright cruel.

Ok, mental note.
Play quiet as per usual because everytime you try to play a little more acttive you end up as a dead villager.

Coincidental. Your activity has little to do with your impending death, nor is survival the goal of a villager.

 

[EUROO7]

At least I can help you with that.

Unvote rammius

Vote ark

please bold your votes

@noobs please bold your votes

 

[Rovsea]

OK, since nobody else has, I will acknowledge that that is a cute dog, particularly in that picture.

 

[Spockyt]

Do you have some kind of problem with dogs?

Yes.


Anyway, I was only joking.

Unvote Claude.
Vote Ramius.

 

[madchemist]

I'm pretty sure Claude is not a wolf, but is rather a newb villager who is reacting to pressure in the only way he knows how. Personally, I think I've earned enough respect that you would trust my hunches by now, weak as they may seem to be, knowing that if I'm a wolf protecting a packmate the seer will probably find out soon enough. But that's your affair, I guess.

 

[Claude LC]

please bold your votes

@noobs please bold your votes

Normally I bold them and put them in a bigger size. But since I'm being killed.

 

[Rovsea]

Voting the man for his cute dog? You are either an Austrian or just downright cruel.



Coincidental. Your activity has little to do with your impending death, nor is survival the goal of a villager.

I've noted that more active people usually die earlier. This is primarily because, on day one especially, the only "suspicious" actions you can find tend to pop up in the posts of people who post more often. In other words, the more you post, the more people can find potentially suspicious things in your posts. It's inherently dangerous to be more active earlier.

 

[Hax]

Official votecount, day 1 ~ 13 minutes to deadline

Claude LC: 3
Audren [113]
Wagonlitz [152]
EUROO7 [121 Wagonlitz -> 188 Arkasas -> 197 Rovsea -> 221]

Spockyt: 3
aedan777 [161]
ramius3443 [165]
Rovsea [173 Claude LC -> 181]

Arkasas: 3
madchemist [124 deathbywombat -> 155 Claude LC -> 196]
Adamus [117 Spockyt -> 220]
Claude LC [153 ramius3443 -> 231]

ramius3443: 3
deathbywombat [151]
alynkio [166]
Spockyt [167 ramius3443 -> 224 Claude LC -> 235]

Audren: 2
Adamgerd [146]
Eternaly_Lost [126 randakar -> 215]

Wagonlitz: 1
Arkasas [134 Audren -> 138]

EUROO7: 1
randakar [147]

Non-voters: 0

 

[Rovsea]

I will break a TIE, if nobody else will.