-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It's incredibly dumb, but it's also shockingly rare that I've seen a weak player have the presence of mind to use it when a wolf. And it doesn't work when someone is considered a good player. I've seen this dozens of times and I'm not sure I've ever seen a wolf pull it.
Thanks
Ok in my book you are a baddie, anyone not interested in a cute dog is a baddie.
I could go for the easy save and vote for Claude, but he has been up all day, and hasn't done a bad job of defending, for day 1 standards at least. Despite owning a dog.
Ok, time
So.
Everybody atacking my defense.
How do you defend yourself on Day 1 when there is no info in anything.
Im all ears.
Sorry grammar teacher.
Edited:
Quit the nazi part, it's a term I don't like and don't think is appropiate. A apology if it was rude to anyone.
So.
Everybody atacking my defense.
How do you defend yourself on Day 1 when there is no info in anything.
Im all ears.
Sorry grammar teacher.
Edited:
Quit the nazi part, it's a term I don't like and don't think is appropiate. A apology if it was rude to anyone.
If you could provide an example, I'd be greatly obliged to you.
It's a bit of a gray area whether I consider you strong enough that I wouldn't buy that defense from you, though. I'd have to think about it.
This would make Aedan a spelling nazi. I, however, rather enjoyed analisis. Though anal and ISIS seem like two things we might be better off avoiding in combination.
Awaiting cute puppy picture. If there is a Claude/MC connection, we're now all aware of it's potential existence.
Awaiting cute puppy picture. If there is a Claude/MC connection, we're now all aware of it's potential existence.
You basically can't. Conversely, that means no one else can either. So the best defense on day 1 is an offense against someone else. This is far from foolproof though, and many people end up lynched day 1 through no fault of their own.
It's poor spelling I mocked, not the grammar of it.
Honestly I don't think I've used it in a while, and my recollection of more recent werewolf games is a bit blurred by lack of attention. I could go back digging up games where I died early but that would be both time consuming and depressing. I also don't think it worked very often.
The full trajectory of Emcee's posts with regard to the Claude affair reveals ulterior motives. First he votes him (if they are packmates, an alibi vote [though this is beneath madchemist] would fit). Then, he questions Rovsea's motives in unvoting Claude (giving off the impression of being a strong prosecutor of the noob, a more contrived form of the alibi vote). Then he unvotes him in the face of the wimpiest defense. This last element both gives me the biggest reason to vote madchemist, and the biggest reason to not vote madchemist.
On the one hand, this gives madchemist and claude surface-level antagony that might later be used as a defense for either one if one is lynched and found a wolf. On the other hand, this ploy is so transparent that I don't think madchemist would use it, unless he knew we'd see it as transparent and would not expect him to use it.
and now i've caught myself in a logic loop. fug
On the one hand, this gives madchemist and claude surface-level antagony that might later be used as a defense for either one if one is lynched and found a wolf. On the other hand, this ploy is so transparent that I don't think madchemist would use it, unless he knew we'd see it as transparent and would not expect him to use it.
and now i've caught myself in a logic loop. fug
Attachments
Assuming I been keeping track of the votes correctly since the last vote count, we still got a tie going on. One way or another we want to break this tie, because it almost certain that both are not baddies. The odds of two wolves in a lite game being running up day 1 are so small, it just able never happens.
Personally, I would like to see a swing onto a new third party.
I know there is some interest in making that third person Audren, so...
Unvote randakar, Vote Audren
Personally, I would like to see a swing onto a new third party.
I know there is some interest in making that third person Audren, so...
Unvote randakar, Vote Audren
.png){kind=avatar}
I see no particular reason not to kill one of Claude or Rovsea, preference towards Claude. The potential link between them intrigues me more than voting somebody else.
Is there? what is this interest you speak of? just austrian propaganda.
