Oh well. Fair enough.Yes, you have. Sorry.
Alxeu will be subbing in for Spockyt.
Good luck everyone.
Oh well. Fair enough.Yes, you have. Sorry.
Alxeu will be subbing in for Spockyt.
As Rovs also pointed out I actually made things closer. Would you have preferred that I either stayed on jeray (which was turning into a throwaway) or that I just piled on F72?Indeed I actually misread that vote count (in my rush to get out the door)
Luftwafer [50]
Jacksonian Missionary [67 Mullish Wag (Established Nickname of Wagonlitz) -> 77 Rovsea -> 79]
Mullish Wag (Established Nickname of Wagonlitz) [94 Jeray2000 -> 121]
Rovsea [55 Mullish Wag (Established Nickname of Wagonlitz) -> 61 Jeray2000 -> 118 F72Voyager -> 124]
F72 Voyager [69 Rovsea -> 120 F72 Voyager -> 125]
JM is not the culprit I was looking for.
UNVOTE JM
VOTE WAGON OF LITZ
He hasn't played much. But at least the game where he was seer he was pretty active. Can't remember how he was when wolf, but think he was too. So perhaps this is a sign of him being a plain villager?But then again maybe he's just another 1 post a day guys and if he is CAWZ even better a reason to lynch him.
Now you know how I feel about being early lynched most games.This is mostly frustrating because it keeps happening, even when I'm sincere and I think it should be obvious that I'm actually trying my best as a villager.
Ugh... Ok, look. First of all, he was "complaining" about the excessive analysis, so now it makes perfect sense. Second, Wagon is actually tied for first place, you arrogant numskull. Jesus Harbinger Christ, you can't possibly be this arrogant about getting your facts wrong, can you? Try to be less condescending at least.Love your analysis to be honest.
3 lines complaining about the lack of analysis.
And why is Wagon not in the running
Go for it tbh.
Your whole arguement is that
1) I'm too condescending
2) I voted for a villager, day 1.
Both of which are shakey to the extreme
Wagon is in the running, but he shouldn't be because his actions overall speak to the normal Wagon play-style, to my mind.Love your analysis to be honest.
3 lines complaining about the lack of analysis.
And why is Wagon not in the running
It's my experience that activity breeds data. Analyzing stuff may not give many helpful conclusions at this point, but taking a stance will give us more helpful conclusions later. Low activity and lack of analysis only help the wolves.it's a tossup between @Rovsea and @Luftwafer ... so....
VOTE LUFTWAFTER
seriously? 1 day of voting and these reams of analysis? only wolves have any information at this point.
No, my argument is that you're being an annoying little shit. I'll be the first to admit that it's not the best argument in the world, but I'm being honest with myself and this thread.Go for it tbh.
Your whole arguement is that
1) I'm too condescending
2) I voted for a villager, day 1.
Both of which are shakey to the extreme
entirely possible - and usually correct.It's my experience that activity breeds data. Analyzing stuff may not give many helpful conclusions at this point, but taking a stance will give us more helpful conclusions later. Low activity and lack of analysis only help the wolves.
You have equally shakey but 'valid' arguements for anyone who voted for a villager yesterday
Ok, so here It is.
You're voting for me because you don't like me.
You truly are MLG