-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Have more confidence in yourself, experience really doesn't count for much.
Don't blindly follow EURO in the grounds he knows what he is doing. He does, but you don't know the real point of his machinations and whether aedan really should be lynched.
Probably the most absurd part of Euro's "case" against me is that it is equally applicable against himself. Euro says a smart wolf would hunt Hax, but then that means he knows the smart move would be to hunt hax, ergo he would also be a smart wolf who could have made the hunt. It's a silly case either way, but anyone following it should rethink their votes on me based on the above.
Regardless of how Euro puts his reasoning, any voting strategy that targets the village at lynching smart players is exceedingly likely to be bad for the village if and when it backfires and kills villagers. I'm not saying players considered smart or good should be above the lynch, but lynching them because they are smart or good is not a helpful strategy for the village, except by wild chance.
Anyways I'm not a wolf (or due to the RP I guess I am, that was a confusing PM to get when I skipped reading the RP roles), so lynching me is a bad idea. Yesterday wasn't overly helpful in giving us actual information to go on though, and anyone reading much into who voted the seer is being silly, since no one, villagers or wolves, knew he was the seer. Most that can be said is that Audren rose above Health and Alynkio is the votes, so maybe there was something of a save attempt. Claude was one of the late Audren voters, giving his vote right before deadline with no explanation, and hasn't been on since to give any later explanation or add other commentary. Not good for a case, but I'd like to pressure some activity out of him.
Vote Claude
Regardless of how Euro puts his reasoning, any voting strategy that targets the village at lynching smart players is exceedingly likely to be bad for the village if and when it backfires and kills villagers. I'm not saying players considered smart or good should be above the lynch, but lynching them because they are smart or good is not a helpful strategy for the village, except by wild chance.
Anyways I'm not a wolf (or due to the RP I guess I am, that was a confusing PM to get when I skipped reading the RP roles), so lynching me is a bad idea. Yesterday wasn't overly helpful in giving us actual information to go on though, and anyone reading much into who voted the seer is being silly, since no one, villagers or wolves, knew he was the seer. Most that can be said is that Audren rose above Health and Alynkio is the votes, so maybe there was something of a save attempt. Claude was one of the late Audren voters, giving his vote right before deadline with no explanation, and hasn't been on since to give any later explanation or add other commentary. Not good for a case, but I'd like to pressure some activity out of him.
Vote Claude
euro has a few points which are worth considering. however, I think claude is the better lynch at this moment.
regardless, we are swinging blind right now.
regardless, we are swinging blind right now.
Why? Alynkio was a late voter on Audren, but since he was tied with Audren and Health before he switched to Audren, he'd have an interest in lynching Audren regardless of his role, since he wouldn't want to be lynched himself. Even if we assume that Audren was lynched to save another major candidate, it could be either of Health and Alynkio that is implicated. Plus Alynkio's made a decent length post today, and generally explains himself, unlike Claude. As I said in the section you're quoting, I don't think it's a great case against Claude, but I want some activity from him.
I think Health, Alynkio, and Claude are all equally good candidates for now. Personally I lean towards lynching inactive people if all else is equal, so I'm staying on Claude.
The case on Claude only works if he was intentionally saving one of Health or Alynkio. Without that, he may as well be a hapless villager unwittingly voting to kill the useless seer. Though I see the virtue of voting someone who wasn't a candidate yesterday, there is also something to be said for offering a choice. You never know what you might catch.
That said, I was not aware we were still with health. Let us do away with health.
Unvote Alicante
Vote Health
I would say it looks like Claude was just voting whoever was leading as it was on deadline he voted, but all he has said since joining is two words. I mean, it's more than me, but I didn't post at all yesterday.
@Claude LC , feel like saying anything else?
Vote Claude.
@Claude LC , feel like saying anything else?
Vote Claude.
I was pretty sure that I was going to die in that TIE, but it seems that I'm still alive and thus should actually contribute something. I don't really blame alynkio for sniping to avoid putting himself in the TIE and I would expect that if he were a mad conspiracy theorist that he would try to keep the possible swing more hidden or at least he would've tried to solicit me in a PM. Otherwise, it seems to me that we're pretty much swinging blind.
I know that you're not a fan of health and safety, but don't let that hatred mislead you.
I know that you're not a fan of health and safety, but don't let that hatred mislead you.
So you're ok with voting aedan... because aedan wasn't hunted? Or specifically because Hax was unlikely to be lynched early? Do you even understand EURO's points? I didn't like the "no reason" Spockyt vote close to deadline yesterday.
Vote Aramael
5 people voted the Seer. It's impossible that at least one villager wasn't voting the seer. So I'm not sure why you want to implicate somebody based on information that literally only one player had access to (unless Audren contacted whoever he N0 scanned, of course).
From Griffin's exchange, I'm now getting more of a confused villager vibe than wolf. Though he is blowing in the wind to a disturbing degree. I was thinking of turning up the heat on Rovsea, largely for being quiet, but then the man himself showed up. I too, as I mentioned, found Aramaels vote mildly suspicious, and am more sold on her than I am on Claude. I think we might wait in vain for Claude to explain himself though. He probably won't show up until 1 second before deadline (or 5 mins after). Also I'm not going to even try to suss out how Aedan went from obvious wolf to totally cleared. (Though I agree there's no solid case for him)
UNVOTE GRIFFIN, VOTE ARAMAEL
UNVOTE GRIFFIN, VOTE ARAMAEL
Well, Aramael doesn't seem too active, and her last vote is quite suspicious. I think I'll join others.
Unvote aedan
Vote Aramael
Unvote aedan
Vote Aramael