-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Official count, day 1 4 hours and 42 minutes to deadline
Marshall: 3
F72Voyager [91]
Jacksonian Missionary [109]
Tornadoli [99 Marshall > 117 Spock -> 121]
Jackson: 2
Gen. Marshall [67]
Audren [88 Rovs -> 103]
Spock: 2
Rovsea [107 Marshall -> 118]
EUROO7 [90 Marshall -> 111 Audren -> 120]
EURO: 1
Hax [86]
Hax: 1
Lemeard [98]
Lem: 1
De Chatillôn [105]
Canadien: 1
Spockyt [115]
Not voted: 5
@Canadian_95_RTS []
@DragonOfAtlantis []
@Health []
@aedan777 []
@Claude LC []
Marshall: 3
F72Voyager [91]
Jacksonian Missionary [109]
Tornadoli [99 Marshall > 117 Spock -> 121]
Jackson: 2
Gen. Marshall [67]
Audren [88 Rovs -> 103]
Spock: 2
Rovsea [107 Marshall -> 118]
EUROO7 [90 Marshall -> 111 Audren -> 120]
EURO: 1
Hax [86]
Hax: 1
Lemeard [98]
Lem: 1
De Chatillôn [105]
Canadien: 1
Spockyt [115]
Not voted: 5
@Canadian_95_RTS []
@DragonOfAtlantis []
@Health []
@aedan777 []
@Claude LC []
What the hell are you all even doing. You're all messing about voting randomly and meanwhile, I still have the most votes even though there is no case on me. It's completely bonkers that you would vote randomly on a day with so much information - and I hold that against Spockyt as much as I do against Tornadoli.
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for the first person to join me in taking a good look at Jacksonian. @aedan777 , care to chime in?
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for the first person to join me in taking a good look at Jacksonian. @aedan777 , care to chime in?
You didn't answer my question.
I will vote you in 2 minutes unless I get an answer.
Euro's syndrome is when ****faces decide to **** ******* *** and then *** ***** *****ly follow your ***** vote.
I hope that answers your question.
You seem rather obsessed with rules. Not sure if that's Conshitvative RP or just Danish RP.
I'll avoid the obvious revenge vote on Spocky. Otherwise, his statement is dumb, but I'm not sure if it's wolfishly dumb yet. Jackson, on the other hand, seems to be pissed off in a way I don't usually see from him. Add to that the hunt on Jeray, and I think it's worth a vote.
Vote Jacksonian Missionary
Vote Jacksonian Missionary
Jag kan inte riktigt tolerera många av dessa fall till nominellt värde. Ändå tror jag att det allmänna fallet är mycket användbar.
Jeg kan ikke rigtig tåle mange af disse tilfælde til deres nominelle værdi. Alligevel mener jeg, at brødet sag er meget nyttig.
Jeg kan ikke rigtig tåle mange af disse tilfælde til deres nominelle værdi. Alligevel mener jeg, at brødet sag er meget nyttig.
I think your "case" against Jacksonian doesn't hold any water. He normally reacts poorly to bad cases against him, and your initial case was quite domb, even by your own admission. He's the type of player who does not like being voted for stupid reasons, and he makes his objections known. So I don't see his behaviour as wolfish, since it fits his standard behaviour for the situation.
At the same time, the counter push against Marshall seems odd. How exactly has anything Marshall's done make him a likely wolf? We saw just last game that he likes to screw around and he was a villager then. I can't even find any coherent reasoning behind the votes against Marshall that indicates him as a wolf besides Rovsea saying Marshall isn't usually this aggressive, which is just false.
Spockyt's a somewhat better candidate for avoiding any commentary on the situation so far. He also votes Canadian and I'm pretty sure Canadian is a village, since I doubt a wolf Canadian would go to these lengths to make pms with everyone. At the same time, his comment that none of the cases being day 1 worthy isn't entirely wrong. The cases against Jacksonian and Marshall are incredibly weak, even for day 1. As much as Canadian's pms made today active, I don't think they gave us any useful information, just a bunch of noise. Spockyt's limited reaction to the goings on of the day and "random" vote on the only player likely to be a goodie out of this mess still make me quite suspicious of him.
Vote Spockyt
Where 'ave I voted you randomly? None of my votes were random, at all. Lying isn't helping your case here, buddy.
Hmm...
None of the cases seem decent, even for day one. I'll admit that the Canadian situation isn't that odd as it seemed to me this morning, but I still have some amounts of doubt about it. Marshall seems to be trying to embody the spirit of EURO, not really sure whether it is good or bad at this moment. It did make for an interesting finale to the previous lite, so props for trying, I guess. I don't see much merit in the Jacksonian case as he always reacts strongly to cases against him. The Spocky case seems to be that of distance, which whilst it makes sense seems like a CAWZish case on D1. I'd like it if more people were brought up for discussion, though seeming that there aren't good cases I'll pick one at random.
VOTE HAX
None of the cases seem decent, even for day one. I'll admit that the Canadian situation isn't that odd as it seemed to me this morning, but I still have some amounts of doubt about it. Marshall seems to be trying to embody the spirit of EURO, not really sure whether it is good or bad at this moment. It did make for an interesting finale to the previous lite, so props for trying, I guess. I don't see much merit in the Jacksonian case as he always reacts strongly to cases against him. The Spocky case seems to be that of distance, which whilst it makes sense seems like a CAWZish case on D1. I'd like it if more people were brought up for discussion, though seeming that there aren't good cases I'll pick one at random.
VOTE HAX
Potentiellt mycket dålig. Det kan bara vara en euro.
Potentielt meget fattige. Der kan kun være én euro.
Who should I vote then, all of the cases today seem terrible and I've got limited time to make up another one.
Where 'ave I voted you randomly? None of my votes were random, at all. Lying isn't helping your case here, buddy.
You voted me just because you didn't like my case, even quoting the WW Big example where we were both villagers. That was pretty damn random in and of itself. Then you voted for Spockyt on an actual case, but randomly switched back again to me.
"Lying".
I considered voting for you because you're being a knobhead, but seeing as that's your usual villager behaviour, it wouldn't be a good case.
You know, I can kinda see how Jackson being belligerent is similar to Torn being insert word that's not nice. Besides, I think that it's odd how Spockyt's weird comment generated some kind of flash-interest in him as a candidate. Objectively, I think the people following my case on Jackson have been rather wolfish themselves, which reminds me of the Big game. Spockyt on the other hand is a pretty decent candidate.
Unvote Jackson
Vote Spockyt
Unvote Jackson
Vote Spockyt