Werewolf Lite CCCLXXII: The Bane of Bane!

[Spockyt]

npstr is my JL partner.

So we have 10 unscanned players, 4 wolves.

Vote al-Aziz

Good choice imo.

I somehow missed the posts between Euro and Jackson quoting me. Just quoting it incase anyone else missed it, as it is rather important.


I don't feel very enthusiastic about Al Aziz's case. Her analysis seems rather sensible, and I'm also guilty of imagining events yesterday.




Vote Ironhide.


For being both in the game, and not at the same time.

Speaking of not being here, I'm not going to be here for the deadline.

 

[Spockyt]

I've read this more than once in the thread from you. Do you mind explaininig how do wolves know who is the seer, and why don't they just hunt him then?

I've noticed it a few times too. I don't see how voting the seer is anymore suspicious then voting a villager.

 

[Jacksonian Missionary]

I've read this more than once in the thread from you. Do you mind explaininig how do wolves know who is the seer, and why don't they just hunt him then?

It isn't so much that he knew but he voted for a known goodie twice. The real crime in my eyes is switching off of him to a complete throwaway very late in the day when Capi was up there as the lead candidate.

 

[al-Aziz]

It isn't so much that he knew but he voted for a known goodie twice. The real crime in my eyes is switching off of him to a complete throwaway very late in the day when Capi was up there as the lead candidate.

Why would switching off the seer be a bad thing, even supposing that he knew Capibara's role?

 

[Tornadoli]

Why would switching off the seer be a bad thing, even supposing that he knew Capibara's role?

This isn't a big, how would he know of Capi's role?

 

[al-Aziz]

This isn't a big, how would he know of Capi's role?

I know that he wouldn't. Any case that claims he is suspicious because of his interactions with the seer assumes he knew or suspected the role of the seer. Jackson's assertation that switching off the seer was suspicious relied on the assumption that he knew or suspected the seer. I asked why switching off a known seer would have been suspicious.

 

[Jacksonian Missionary]

Why would switching off the seer be a bad thing, even supposing that he knew Capibara's role?

Because he could be a wolf who doesn't want to be linked to lynching someone he knows isn't a wolf.

 

[Cliges]

Because he could be a wolf who doesn't want to be linked to lynching someone he knows isn't a wolf.

Vote Jackson

I think you're spouting any old nonsense at this point.

 

[Jacksonian Missionary]

Vote Jackson

I think you're spouting any old nonsense at this point.

Is it? I literally just got run up for the same thing in the last big where I was a baddie.

 

[Canadian_95_RTS]

This is classic baddie tell, Talking up one candidate and then voting a completely different one at the end. Canadian is also much more capable at solid analysis than this. 60% certainty of being a wolf.

To be fair, both were decent candidates. There just wasn't much to say on the whole Wagon-Ithvan business.

Hi! I had to go to a school thing yesterday, so. *shrugs




Really? Your suspicions? What suspicions?

Well, on the first day he decided to try and orchestrate a mass-voteswitch, which I found incredibly odd. Add to that the fact that he voted for the seer, meaning he's most likely not part of the JL, and I think it's enough to look into.

Oh, I realize now that Chieron's statement was probably because of the new information about the number of scans.

So I'll take the next supicious actor and

Vote Canadian

I don't really get this. I mean, yeah, I haven't been playing as well, but I do have off days. I've almost gotten lynched in all the games I've played thus far, and most of those were for crovaxes that weren't actually a thing.

 

[Comm Cody]

GM will be traveling and may not be online for the deadline.

I will try to get the update out as quick as possible.

 

[Ithvan]

Somewhat conflicted about Spockyt. He voted the seer 2 days in a row

There are no SA wolves in this game. It is known.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Count?

 

[Chieron]

Well, with Ithvan not being anymore scanned that everyone else..

unvote Ithvan

vote al-Aziz

 

[Chieron]

Unofficial votecount:

al-Aziz - 4

• npstr/Sandr (346)
• Tornadoli (347)
• Canadian (327 Ithvan -> 348)
• Chieron (322 Ithvan ->374)

Canadian_RTS - 2

• Jacksonian Missionary (333)
• al-Aziz (359)

Ironhide - 1

• Spockyt (361)

Jacksonian Missionary - 1

• Cliges (368)

Not voted - 2

• @Wagonlitz /enkhuush
• @Ithvan

 

[Wagonlitz]

I agree that Canadien has been sketchy. I am not too sure on Aziz, since she seemed to get into action today, but she could still be a waffle.

Vote Canadien

 

[al-Aziz]

Well, on the first day he decided to try and orchestrate a mass-voteswitch, which I found incredibly odd. Add to that the fact that he voted for the seer, meaning he's most likely not part of the JL, and I think it's enough to look into.

I don't necessarily think that a voteswitch is suspicious. It's fairly common behavior.

And we only know two JL members currently, so it's not really something against him so much as a simple statement.

Because he could be a wolf who doesn't want to be linked to lynching someone he knows isn't a wolf.

I find your logic here fragile, though it was somewhat irregular.

 

[al-Aziz]

I agree that Canadien has been sketchy. I am not too sure on Aziz, since she seemed to get into action today, but she could still be a waffle.

Vote Canadien

Why do you think this?

 

[Wagonlitz]

Why do you think this?

As somebody else pointed out earlier today Canadien yesterday did some not particularly good analysis and then decided to make a vote out of his arse on another player. That is not really goodie like.

 

[Ironhide G1]

Are we tying today?

VOTE Al- Aziz
The case on her seems the most solid. Sorry Ive been busy today I wish I had more time but I rarely do.