Revenge-Vote Audren
I haven't been able to do this for a while, either.
How do you know why he was hunted?
Vote Rovsea
Right, sorry.
Unvote Audren
Vote Rovsea
Here we see the day one interaction between Audren and Panzer. Panzer makes a case against rov based on this supposed crovax:
Wow, that's a shock. Hunt bait was hunted. Color me surprised. EURO, if you were a more conventional player people wouldn't have hunted you. Because you're so unpredictable, you were hunted because "that sounds like something EURO would do".
I'll hold my vote in confidence for the moment.
Needless to say it was weak.
Okay this is where this goes from overanalyzing to plain stupid. When was the last time any wolf used alibi votes? How the hell do you expect anyone to use a vote that lasted a few hours into day 0 as alibi? Are you even *trying* to think your posts through before posting?
Inb4 "You're getting defensive you must be a wolf" tunnel vision
Dumb reasoning by Panzer. One, alibi votes happen all the time. Two, I get the sense he's being overprotective. He's was not in the three-way tie we had on day one.
Official count, 56 minutes to deadline
IG: 3
Jacksonian Missionary [176]
Dr.Livingstone [188]
Rovsea [227]
Rovs: 3
Panzer Commader [187 Audren -> 197]
jacob-Lundgren [202]
VanMavus [204]
Audren: 3
snoopdogg [208]
Tornadoli [182 Capi -> 224]
Lemeard [244]
Livingstone: 3
Audren [180 Panzer -> 229]
aedan777 [258]
npstr [181 snoop -> 261]
Panzer: 1
Ironhide G1 [179 Audren -> 199]
npstr: 1
Capibara [185]
Jackson: 1
Sleepyhead [223]
Not voted: 1
@Delta21 []
I say you and Ironhide deserve to be tied. Killing four players on day 1 is our sure way to lose this before it even started.
Unvote Livingstone
Vote Panzer
Pre-deadline votecount, a dumb response by Panzer. At this point Audren calls him out on it, unvotes me and votes panzer. I think he uses this in the case that if one of them get's lynched, they can use this for cover.
She was using the gender neutral pronoun.
Vote Rovsea
Day two. Panzer yet again vote Rov, though it is somewhat understandable because of day two shenanigans.
unless rovsea and he are both wolves
This has been proven to be false. I am not a crook!
sorry for being inactive today i'm behind on my schoolwork again ;_;
i've read the thread and no case seems particularly convincing but i think van's been giving me the worst vibes among the candidates.
vote van mavus
A vote on a quiet candidate, probably a throwaway. I've been told that announcing inactivity is a sign of wolfishness. That, plus a throwaway when he is inactive is more than enough to get on his case.
In conclusion, Panzer has been running around the village not helping anyone or anything in the slightest. A vote on him is a vote for the village!