Werewolf Lite CCCLXIII: The Knights Who Say Ni!

[madchemist]

You know it's first day and we must kill someone and for some reason I think you're a good candidate. And your mindless insults against me aren't helping your cause.

Ah, so you actually do think he's a "good" candidate. Is there a reason for this?

And we should question such consequential votes, not just take them in stride as "idiots will be idiots"

I'm a lot more tolerant of such votes on day 1 than I am when there's actual data. But yes, something bothers me about this one all the same, and I don't think it's just my natural bias against voting a good player/scan magnet without very solid reasons for it.

 

[De Chatillôn]

Ah, so you actually do think he's a "good" candidate. Is there a reason for this?

I don't like his foul-mouthed behaviour against me and I've no better reasons against any other player. And I don't like that idea that you and other players have about making some players untouchables.

 

[EUROO7]

I don't like his foul-mouthed behaviour against me

You special little snowflake. I'm so, so apologetic. Please forgive my foul, dirty mouth. I obviously didn't consider your special, special needs.

 

[De Chatillôn]

You special little snowflake. I'm so, so apologetic. Please forgive my foul, dirty mouth. I obviously didn't consider your special, special needs.

I forgive you don't worry.

 

[EUROO7]

I forgive you don't worry.

Good, now who should we lynch?

 

[De Chatillôn]

Good, now who should we lynch?

I don't know. I'm voting you.

 

[EUROO7]

Yeah, no resentment there.

Good meta, would get mad again.

 

[madchemist]

I don't like his foul-mouthed behaviour against me and I've no better reasons against any other player.

*Nods*

I can understand that.

And I don't like that idea that you and other players have about making some players untouchables.

I'm not entirely comfortable with it myself, but I prefer winning to not winning, and a living EURO tends to find a lot more wolves than a living some-other-player if he's a goodie. With those last four words obviously being the critical ones right here.

 

[aedan777]

What's the votecount look like currently?

 

[De Chatillôn]

I'm not entirely comfortable with it myself, but I prefer winning to not winning, and a living EURO tends to find a lot more wolves than a living some-other-player if he's a goodie. With those last four words obviously being the critical ones right here.

I understand but I don't share that thought because if the player is a baddie then the village is leaving his game in the hands of a wolf especially if we lose the seer. I don't want to lynch good players first either, of course. I only want to treat everyone equally. Anyway there're 17 players here and we're speaking only about one vote, my vote. You can choose any other player for the lynchment, including myself.

 

[EUROO7]

Hazbot -3- Skobelev, k-59, Audren,
Euro -3- Ike, Chatidiot, Marty,
Chatidiot -2- Aedan, Euro,
Skobelev -1- Madchem,
Ike -1- Livingstone,
Aedan -1- Spockyt,
k-59 -1- Cody,
Cody -1- Najs,
Rovsea -1- Hazbot,

 

[madchemist]

Right. So this is about the time that I'd usually propose a switch to someone who's said maybe two words all game and hope we get lucky. The conversation thus far feels to me like it's produced more heat than light, with EURO and De Chat basically just becoming angry with each other (Unless said anger is a mere facade to hide wolfishness, of course. But I'm hardly convinced that such is true, in either case).


I expect a little more hyperactivity from Ike than I've seen so far. Plus there's the silly RP reason that a shrubber would have many reasons to be in league with the Knights who say Ni.

Unvote Skobie
Vote Ike

 

[aedan777]

No one seems to be acting like a blatant wolf or specifically bad lynch. Day 1 tie is bad, but I don't expect that to last to deadline. Barring anything exceptional in the next ~50 minutes, I don't think a vote change is likely from me.

 

[EUROO7]

When did Madchemist stop being a leader of men?

 

[Rovsea]

I am here now, what is needed of me? Perhaps TIE?

Vote Ike.

 

[EUROO7]

Unvote Idiot
Vote Emperor Ike

Ike -4- Livingstone, Madchemist, Rovsea, Euro,
Hazbot -3- Skobelev, k-59, Audren,
Euro -3- Ike, Chatidiot, Marty,
Chatidiot -1- Aedan,
Aedan -1- Spockyt,
k-59 -1- Cody,
Cody -1- Najs,
Rovsea -1- Hazbot,

 

[Jacksonian Missionary]

Vote Count 40 minutes til Deadline

Emperor Ike: 4
Dr.Livingstone (#157)
madchemist [Skobie #131 -> #212]
Rovsea (#216)
Euro (Audren (# -> Unvote -> De Chat #190 ->#216)

Euro: 3
Ike (#154)
De Chatillon (#140 -> #163)
Marty (#142 -> #164)

Hazbot: 3
Gen. Skobelev [137]
k-59 (#158)
Audren (#165)

De Chatillon: 1
aedan777 [132]

aedan777: 1
Spockyt [133]

Audren: 1
EUROO7 [134]

k-59: 1
Comm Cody (#139)

Comm Cody: 1
Najs (#145)

Rovsea: 1
Hazbot (#141)

 

[madchemist]

No one seems to be acting like a blatant wolf or specifically bad lynch. Day 1 tie is bad, but I don't expect that to last to deadline. Barring anything exceptional in the next ~50 minutes, I don't think a vote change is likely from me.

Pretty much my assessment. We've gotten one unlikely pack interaction with EURO and DC out of today, and neither has impressed me as particularly likely to be on either side. Most of the rest of the day has been a giant meh for me.

When did Madchemist stop being a leader of men?

I lead quietly and do not compel. My wisdom has always been either followed or ignored.

 

[Rovsea]

Unvote Idiot
Vote Emperor Ike

Ike -4- Livingstone, Madchemist, Rovsea, Euro,
Hazbot -3- Skobelev, k-59, Audren,
Euro -3- Ike, Chatidiot, Marty,
Chatidiot -1- Aedan,
Aedan -1- Spockyt,
k-59 -1- Cody,
Cody -1- Najs,
Rovsea -1- Hazbot,

Hmmm, you immediately break the TIE I make. Why?

 

[EnvyDemon]

Vote Hazbot

Remaking the Tie