.png){kind=avatar}
I really can't fault you for much. That post was perfectly crafted to get a response out of me. You had the bad luck of selecting me as your target, but had it been anyone else, you'd see a pretty damning reaction to a post like that.Thanks, I love it when people non-sarcastically compliment me!
I'm not liking this post. Audren never said Euro was a bad lynch, nor did he claim Euro to be a likely villager. He merely pointed out the flaws in the case presented against Euro. Villagers should always be critical of flaws they see in cases being presented, since the person making the cases could have an agenda opposed to the village. Colouring Audren's rightful criticism as protecting euro seeks to imply that Audren has a motive to see euro remain alive, which most likely would make them packmates. Rovsea is more and more becoming my favourite candidate for the day.
So because my question is meant to imply that they could be packmates; yes, I acknowledge that's what it's meant to do, it's bad? No, aedan, you're wrong. I find it interesting that Audren went out of his way to offer an opinion, yes aedan, an opinion, that can in no way be verifiable, to protect another player. I think that this is a huge overreaction to me doing nothing more than prodding Audren.
Being a lawyer is overrated. I much preferred being a politician. We had a good run packmate.
Players offering opinions on other players is how the game is played. Attacking someone for having a reasonable opinion (again, he wasn't saying Euro was a bad lynch, just that the case wasn't a good one) is not terribly conducive to finding wolves. If you mean to say it was just prodding and it shouldn't be taken for too much, then why are you freaking out about me questioning you? I'm still not voting you, so I fail to see how me taking issue with you throwing suspicion on another player for weak reasons qualifies as "a huge overreaction".
I don't like how audren has been reacting to EURO, but it's fine for us to disagree on this point, and in retrospect, your post doesn't seem quite as aggressive as it originally did, but accept that I'm probably not going to agree with you right now.
.
You do raise good points, but I feel I should put up a defence anyway. As I said last game, my style is for the first couple of days only respond if someone directly adresses me, or I feel I have something unique to add. (Later I post my thoughts regardless.) While, yes I wasn't a fan of the cases on Jackson, or Wagon, I also didn't mind if it was them, even though I would have preferred it not to have been. And when I did my vote, that was the earliest I came to the forum after the vote switch happened, (engrossed with American Truck Simulator, and Conclave) and I thought Ike was as good a candidate as we were going to get, and I didn't know it was invalid till I saw the count.
