Nope, last game I explicitly made the village keep Cody alive. Jackson will die today.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nope, last game I explicitly made the village keep Cody alive. Jackson will die today.
Everyone knows that. But that will not change regardless of your role, which we find out tonight when we lynch you.
Good morning.
Vote RepBentley.
For being less active then me today, and I've only just woken up.
Vote RepBentley.
For being less active then me today, and I've only just woken up.
I have never revenge-voted someone before, so let this be my first and probably only time
Vote Tamius23
He's voting me, I want to see him ran up as a consequence. What're you gonna do abou' i'?
I could also be tempted to vote Hazbot (don't like the name), RepBentley (blood debt for zombieing out of a couple of games I've GM'ed, but he seems to be a bit more active these days, which is good), or Gen. Marshall, as killing him would be the closest I can get to killing Cody this game. Or any villager who played in the last game for NOT F***ING LYNCHING CODY.
Vote Tamius23
He's voting me, I want to see him ran up as a consequence. What're you gonna do abou' i'?
I could also be tempted to vote Hazbot (don't like the name), RepBentley (blood debt for zombieing out of a couple of games I've GM'ed, but he seems to be a bit more active these days, which is good), or Gen. Marshall, as killing him would be the closest I can get to killing Cody this game. Or any villager who played in the last game for NOT F***ING LYNCHING CODY.
Wagonlitz is right that it is detrimental to just go with formulaic vote on day one without doing much else. Rovsea is also quite right in his arguments for voting Marty. If everybody just sits and waits for things to happen they won't. I don't think they are very likely candidates to actually do hemp fandango on day 1, though. Both Rovsea & Wagonlitz know this - which might mean they are ballsy to try it anyway. Or... it's safe way to alibi vote. Something to keep in mind, perhaps. *shrug*
Of course Rovsea attacking Wagonlitz for his vote seems oddish. Jacksonian at least seems to have genuine dislike of/ongoing feud with Wagonlitz which might explain his vote a bit.
Other than that, some seemingly random votes & one revenge vote. Hmph.
vote Emperor Ike
as I don't like his no explanation vote. Most others at least provided some sort of reasoning, at least after some prodding.
Of course Rovsea attacking Wagonlitz for his vote seems oddish. Jacksonian at least seems to have genuine dislike of/ongoing feud with Wagonlitz which might explain his vote a bit.
Other than that, some seemingly random votes & one revenge vote. Hmph.
vote Emperor Ike
as I don't like his no explanation vote. Most others at least provided some sort of reasoning, at least after some prodding.
Errors, do point them out.
Jacksonian Missionary: 3
deathbytwombat [132]
EUROO7 [140 Rovsea -> 151]
Emperor Ike [185]
marty99: 2
Rovsea [128]
tamius23 [157]
Wagonlitz: 2
Audren [156]
Jacksonian Missionary [160]
Rovsea: 1
aedan777 [127]
aedan777: 1
Wagonlitz [129]
Gen. Skobelev: 1
Gen. Marshall [158]
RepBentley: 1
Spockyt [184]
tamius23: 1
marty99 [186]
Emperor Ike: 1
Gen. Skobelev [187]
not voted: 3
RepBentley
Hazbot
Najs
Jacksonian Missionary: 3
deathbytwombat [132]
EUROO7 [140 Rovsea -> 151]
Emperor Ike [185]
marty99: 2
Rovsea [128]
tamius23 [157]
Wagonlitz: 2
Audren [156]
Jacksonian Missionary [160]
Rovsea: 1
aedan777 [127]
aedan777: 1
Wagonlitz [129]
Gen. Skobelev: 1
Gen. Marshall [158]
RepBentley: 1
Spockyt [184]
tamius23: 1
marty99 [186]
Emperor Ike: 1
Gen. Skobelev [187]
not voted: 3
RepBentley
Hazbot
Najs
.png){kind=avatar}
This guy gets it.
EURO has been infected by a compulsion to better the game of Werewolf. This infection transcends role.
Anyway, I still find the case on Wagon more compelling than anything else right now, though I support the intent of those who vote Jackson.
That sounds awfully much like a deliberate change in wolf tactics.
Hedging? What's so compelling about Wagon's case?
Lynching EURO was an even more obvious choice, for which you'd have to kill most of the villagers alive in that game past day 2.
Hmm. I find this an intriguing post.
What the hell is the case on Wagon? Some BS I made up to see how Wagon would react?
It sounds to me like a sense of holy purpose, a duty I can respect.
It's less about what's compelling about Wagon's case and more about what's not compelling about the other cases. Jackson's votes come almost exclusively from the holy purpose outlined above; self-improvement. I respect these votes, but they have no bearing on Jackson's actual role. marty's votes are votes probing for reactions. Wagon, however, is acting at least slightly suspicious, with his idealogically sound but almost certainly useless vote on Aedan, which villager ought to know would amount to nothing. I find this to make Wagon slightly more likely to be hairy than Jackson or marty, and I'm going to use my vote to find wolves, not probe other players. I'll leave the probing to y'all.
Develop that "intriguing" angle for the jury. And remember you are still under the oath!
As far as I see there's not much of a case on anybody, just some more or less justified votes. I wonder since when that has been called "case".
Your honour, please instruct the witness to stop dodging the issue!
Again, very confused with how just because I didn't jokingly name a pack pre game means I'm not trying to improve hard enough set by some weird Euro standard.
Well, for one you're actually talking about important things and it sounds as if you're being honest, and not hedging anywhere. That intrigues me, as well as the fact that you can simultaneously analyze two separate actions of mine, condemn one, support the other (somewhat) and not pass a judgement on me or my role. As I said, this intrigues me.
Objection! The witness is clearly trying to intimidate the court and jury by placing an officer of the court, Maurice Levy, under hunt threat.
Just in case (this is just in case ,mind you) I can't be on later, I think that Audren's thinking that there is actually a valid reason to vote Wagon is suspicious.
Unvote marty99, Vote Audren
Unvote marty99, Vote Audren