Guilty until proven innocent, as assuming innocence will more than likely gift baddies important information.Let me ask you a question Euro. Is the game about being innocent until proven guilty, or guilty until proven innocent?
Guilty until proven innocent, as assuming innocence will more than likely gift baddies important information.Let me ask you a question Euro. Is the game about being innocent until proven guilty, or guilty until proven innocent?
Guilty until proven innocent, as assuming innocence will more than likely gift baddies important information.
Arkases
Let me ask you a question Euro. Is the game about being innocent until proven guilty, or guilty until proven innocent?
Let me ask you a question Euro. Is the game about being innocent until proven guilty, or guilty until proven innocent?
There is also logic involved, on occasion.It's a game about killing random people for not doing what you want them to do.
The point is that yes the bandwagon is unlikely to stay; on the other hand making a huge bandwagon may end up with the target losing almost all votes thereby saving him.As though Bandwagons ever last. I merely voted the way I did in the case that I would not have the ability to reach my computer the next day, or am similarly engaged. As is deadline falls well into hours in which I will have a chance at playing the actual game, that is to deduce possible suspects. Yes one could make the case that a random pedestrian would be a better temporary target in this case, but I often times see forum players lynched for random throwaways.
Besides, you are now encouraging an early bandwagon yourself, one that is just as likely to fail in the long term as the Arkases one is. And if, by some miracle, it doesn't fail, and/or you decide to continue to wage this wagon against me, we will merely see the same result as we did yesterday, that is to say, another dead villager.
oh
ok.
I agree that it seems suspicious; that bandwagon is much more suspicious though. Dadarian put Arkasas to three votes---when nobody else had votes.Holy bandwagon, Batman!
Is the parrot still alive, I hope?
Vote aedan777
Something seemed wrong about this post.
Why defend the hunt and decry the need to random vote when that's what usually happens on day 1?
And Livingstone remakes the three vote lead to Arkasas.Vote Arkasas
Until a better candidate presents themselves.
If you are making a placeholder then you don't put it on a bandwagon. And EURO wasn't bandwagoning you, since before his vote you had 0 votes. You sound like a wolf trying to escape.As though Bandwagons ever last. I merely voted the way I did in the case that I would not have the ability to reach my computer the next day, or am similarly engaged. As is deadline falls well into hours in which I will have a chance at playing the actual game, that is to deduce possible suspects. Yes one could make the case that a random pedestrian would be a better temporary target in this case, but I often times see forum players lynched for random throwaways.
Besides, you are now encouraging an early bandwagon yourself, one that is just as likely to fail in the long term as the Arkases one is. And if, by some miracle, it doesn't fail, and/or you decide to continue to wage this wagon against me, we will merely see the same result as we did yesterday, that is to say, another dead villager.