-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Also, note to the GM: I seem to have missed that we had a non-voter yesterday. GermanKaiser did not vote, and probably should be subbed.
Vote Arkansas
Better then nothing at the moment. Subject to change without notice.
Better then nothing at the moment. Subject to change without notice.
Madchemist is awarded with a pet parrot, and Wagonlitz is officially subbed in for GermanKaiser.
Holy bandwagon, Batman!
Is the parrot still alive, I hope?
Vote aedan777
Something seemed wrong about this post.
Why defend the hunt and decry the need to random vote when that's what usually happens on day 1?
Is the parrot still alive, I hope?
Vote aedan777
Something seemed wrong about this post.
Why defend the hunt and decry the need to random vote when that's what usually happens on day 1?
Usually the seer isn't hunted day 1. With the seer gone, village needs to take any clue it can get, and the main way random or weak voting ends is when the seer outs a wolf. Since that's clearly not going to happen, village needs to do more, but there wasn't much of a possibility for it yesterday. Examining all the aspects of a situation is not a wolf move. A wolf wouldn't be pointing out details and coming to an empty conclusion, not when everyone else is fine with random voting.
Random or weak voting usually ends when a wolf dies, by any means (outing or otherwise), or when behavioral cues or timing of votes appear indicative of someone being a wolf.
I'm fine with you saying there's nothing to analyze at the time and making a random vote, but the way you phrased it is a bit weird, and made me uneasy. I'm keeping my vote here until further notice.
I don't really know what you mean about my phrasing, but that's gotten me into trouble in the past I guess. Just last lite I was lynched because my explanation confused people, despite the fact I was a villager there too. It seems sometimes I just do a poor job at getting my point across clearly. Don't have a better explanation than that.
As for who is suspicious, I can't say I like the bandwagon on Arkasas. Too many, too quick, for too little. Maybe they got lucky, but I don't think Arkasas is suspicious enough to justify all those votes. No idea what's up with Rovsea. No one's jumping out to me as obvious wolf, but I'm somewhat suspicious of 2kNikk. He tried to get a voteswitch going on to arkasas before arkasas made his odd comments, and was very quick to jump on him today. Livingstone jumped around a lot yesterday, which could be wolf behaviour, but he was in danger himself, so it could've just been self-preservation. Outside of them, no one's popped up on my radar much.
Vote 2kNikk
May or may not change as situation develops.
Again, I know it's early but I really get a wolf feel off if Arkasas, and not just his ill-advised comment.
Also...NBA's back!
Also...NBA's back!
Just a heads up.
My activity may be low for the next two days due to recording obligations.
My activity may be low for the next two days due to recording obligations.
.png){kind=avatar}
Your feelings are ill-advised. Those who are wise do not have feelings. They have thoughts. My thoughts cast you as an unintelligent villager, who is not of the People's Justice League. Begone.
Looks like one just did.
For the crime of bandwagoning, I condemn thee.
Vote Livingstone
As though Bandwagons ever last. I merely voted the way I did in the case that I would not have the ability to reach my computer the next day, or am similarly engaged. As is deadline falls well into hours in which I will have a chance at playing the actual game, that is to deduce possible suspects. Yes one could make the case that a random pedestrian would be a better temporary target in this case, but I often times see forum players lynched for random throwaways.
Besides, you are now encouraging an early bandwagon yourself, one that is just as likely to fail in the long term as the Arkases one is. And if, by some miracle, it doesn't fail, and/or you decide to continue to wage this wagon against me, we will merely see the same result as we did yesterday, that is to say, another dead villager.
You may know that. We don't. We have no reason to believe you. The only thing we can do is judge your actions.
Do better if you're a villager.
Let me ask you a question Euro. Is the game about being innocent until proven guilty, or guilty until proven innocent?