Let's not go full Wagonlitz on a random sarcastic remark of Euro.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Let's not go full Wagonlitz on a random sarcastic remark of Euro.
Seems like quite a lot of people took it seriously with all these "pls gib me permission to play" posts.
there's a now banned (i think) forumite who is not allowed to participate in any games i gm.
It wouldn't be the first invitation only game, and euro is an ardent supporter of a gm's right to be picky. I'm not sure why you'd think euro isn't serious. The only question for me is whether he'd want to go through with it.
Maybe this is all an act, EURO has outsmarted us all, and he will adopt a more moderate position once the Big actually starts.
...wait, did I just enter the Trump Dump thread by accident?
Last edited:
I hope he isn't acting. This is EURO as I hope him to be; he does as he pleases.
.png){kind=avatar}
I'm all for letting the GM deny a player if they so choose: al-Aziz did it in her Lite, and I think that went alright.
Sure, if they broke rules or the spirit of the game before. Arbitrarily though? I'm against it, for the reasons stated before. You don't want people to play differently to avoid insulting the next GM in the current game for instance.
The GM is checked by their players. If the GM does something stupid, their players call them out on it. Something so petty as that would be objected to.
So for what reasons other than previous rule breaking should a GM not allow a player to play in their game?
Only people of the Aryan race should be allowed to play WW games.
I'm not entirely comfortable with "inferior play" as a reason, but I feel that a lack of activity is reasonable.
CAWZ-ing for example, but I can think of other things too.
And maybe his set-up only works for a certain number of players, so he likes to select the players he accepts if there are more than he can handle in his set-up.
Invite only works well for lites where all the players have to involved for the game to best. Bigs on the other hand I think are better served with more players even if those players are CAWZ targets*.
*upto about 40 players.
*upto about 40 players.
Imagine the gm of the next game is a goodie in the current game. He's done some suspicious stuff and you shoot him as a hunter, thinking he is a baddie. He is pissed. Should he now not let you play because of "inferior play"? I think that's a slippery slope which could negatively affect gameplay for everyone.
That's not what I meant. I was referring to not letting players like DG, CC, or Cody in because of their habitual lazy shenanigans.
If the GM does something so stupid, the players call them out on their bullshit. The slippery slope is not slippery when we build plenty of nets in between.
Then the other players call the GM a jerk and quit his game, which withers and dies. Problem solved.
The invisible hand fixes everything.
New game will be up tomorrow to allow the weekend for sign ups and have first night on Monday.
New game will be up tomorrow to allow the weekend for sign ups and have first night on Monday.