Werewolf General Planning Thread

[LatinKaiser]

As long as it's not the Caliph, it sounds okay.

But let's not do it in a Lite, just in a small Big.

 

[EUROO7]

I am toying with the idea of limited availability for WWCCII. If you would like to participate, converse with me and I'll fill you in.

In the meantime:

 

[Capt. Kiwi]

I'd consider playing if I was permitted.

 

[Ithvan]

So would I.

 

[Tornadoli]

I would like to play, but I think:

I am toying with the idea of limited availability for WWCCII.

is a very bad idea.

 

[LatinKaiser]

I am toying with the idea of limited availability for WWCCII. If you would like to participate, converse with me and I'll fill you in.

In the meantime:

"Injustice League"

You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means.

 

[EUROO7]

"Injustice League"

You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means.

It means what I say it means in my game.

 

[Cliges]

It means what I say it means in my game.

I like how you play by your own rules with these things.

 

[Lemeard]

Alright, where's the next game?

 

[EUROO7]

Thursday

 

[Lemeard]

Deal.

 

[JCan]

Thursday

Is it a Big?

Can I play?

 

[Daffius]

is a very bad idea.

Elaborate

 

[Kaisersohaib]

I am toying with the idea of limited availability for WWCCII. If you would like to participate.

Does this mean it's exclusive to certain players?

 

[Ithvan]

Does this mean it's exclusive to certain players?

I don't really think we have enough players that EURO likes for an "exclusive" game. I mean, a Big usually contains at least 25 people.

 

[Tornadoli]

Elaborate

Having games with "limited availability" goes against the principles of our community.

When playing a game, you shouldn't have to think "Wait, maybe I won't royally screw this player over/hunt him/etc. because he is the next GM and I don't want to get on his 'bad list' ". Not saying that is what EURO has in mind, I don't think limited availability games are a good idea.

 

[npstr]

I think Euro is trolling and you guys are taking him too serious. Don't feed the troll etc. pp

 

[LatinKaiser]

Having games with "limited availability" goes against the principles of our community.

When playing a game, you shouldn't have to think "Wait, maybe I won't royally screw this player over/hunt him/etc. because he is the next GM and I don't want to get on his 'bad list' ". Not saying that is what EURO has in mind, I don't think limited availability games are a good idea.

There is precedent for not allowing players to join because of their past actions/tendencies, though. I guess it all depends on just how "exclusive" the GM wants his game to be.

 

[k-59]

I think Euro is trolling and you guys are taking him too serious. Don't feed the troll etc. pp

I hope so.

 

[Tornadoli]

I think Euro is trolling and you guys are taking him too serious. Don't feed the troll etc. pp

Yeah, I've got that feeling as well, but my point still stands.

There is precedent for not allowing players to join because of their past actions/tendencies, though. I guess it all depends on just how "exclusive" the GM wants his game to be.

Very rarely, and mostly only after consistently breaking rules or the spirit of the game.